accepted Individual
A's
offer, viewing it
as
a unique business opportunity he eagerly wanted
to
pursue. It became apparent to Smith that despite paperwork that indicated to the contrary,
Individual A completely controlled Individual
A's
foreign trust and related foreign companies,
and
made
all substantive decisions regarding all
of
its transactions and investments.
5.
For
the purpose
of
fonning
a similar foreign trust, Individual A referred Smith to
Individual B, a lawyer in private practice in Houston, Texas who specialized in foreign trusts
and
"asset protection" planning. Smith understood that Individual B previously assisted Individual
A's
father in creating Individual
A's
trust in the 1980s.
6. Individual B told Smith that
he
could
fonn
a foreign trust that could hold assets
for
Smith, and that Smith could use and benefit from these assets without paying United States income
tax. In
order
to avoid United States income and estate tax, Smith was
to
have a foreign U.K.
relative
of
his then-spouse ("nominee settlor·') appear to fund the creation
of
the foreign trust
with an initial "donation"
of
$7,500. Individual B told Smith that
he
and his family could
be
named beneficiaries
of
the foreign trust, and that the foreign trust must also include charitable
beneficiaries in
order
to assure the tax-free nature
of
the trust. Despite representations
and
paperwork to the contrary, the charitable aspects
of
the
trust were discretionary, not mandatory.
Individual B also told Smith that the paperwork he and Smith prepared would
make
it appear as
if
the income and assets
of
the trust were not owned
or
taxable to Smith. Smith knew that
the
nominee settlor would not
be
involved in the creation
of
this foreign trust, and would neither
contribute assets to the trust, nor
pay
any fees. Despite appearing too good to
be
true, Smith did
not consult with other reputable tax attorneys
or
legal advisors
he
knew and trusted to verify the
validity, or legal soundness,
of
what Individual B told him. In fact, Individual A told Smith that
aside from Individual B,
he
should not to discuss his offshore structure with other attorneys.
7. Smith paid nearly all the costs and fees associated with the trust. In 2000, Smith
purported
to
have the nominee settlor settle his Belizean trust, called Excelsior Trust
('·Excelsior"). Smith personally paid nearly
half
the $7,500
to
settle the trust and paid the entire
$30,000 in administrative fees required to form and create Excelsior.
Smith's
foreign relative,
the
nominee settlor
of
Excelsior, paid none
of
the administrative fees. Further, from
2000
through
2014, Smith paid annual fees
of
approximately $5,000 to maintain Excelsior
in
Belize.
The
nominee settlor was not involved in the payment
of
these fees. From 2000 through 2014, Smith
also paid Individual B approximately $800,000 in fees for Individual B's assistance with the
creation
of
a false paper trail, regarding the maintenance and operation
of
Excelsior and its related
entities. Smith falsely told the Belizean nominee trustee that
the
initial donation
of
$7,500
came
from the nominee settlor to create the false impression that Excelsior was
an
independent foreign
trust being created and fonned
by
someone
other
than Smith.
8.
Individual B further told Smith that
the
foreign trust could own foreign corporations
to hold various assets in foreign jurisdictions, similar
to
Individual
A's
foreign trust. Smith
understood from Individual B that although assets would
be
held and titled under the foreign
trust and foreign corporate names, Smith could continue to control the assets and use them
for
his personal benefit.
9. With the assistance
of
Individual B, Smith created a foreign limited liability
company named Flash Holdings, LLC ("Flash''),
in
Nevis. At Individual
B's
direction, Smith
Page 2
of
6