A strong moderator is essential to the effectiveness of a focus group discussion. A good
facilitator remains neutral, ensures even participation among the group, and has an ability to
follow up initial guiding questions with relevant additional questions to stimulate reflection and
discussion. The size of the focus group should be big enough that there is a lively exchange
of ideas but not so large that it becomes unmanageable – around 8-15 participants, depending
on the abilities of the moderator.
It is important to adapt the questions and dynamics of the focus group discussion in a way
that will enhance participation in the focus groups. For example, with young people, the focus
groups could be less structured, take place in their usual meeting places, and be adapted to
their forms of expression, and perhaps address issues progressively from most common
problems to more complex ones. Similarly, the guiding questions and the place and format of
the focus group discussions should be tailored to each community group.
At the end of each focus group discussion, while the issues are still fresh in participants’ minds,
it may be valuable for the moderator to conduct a trust and effectiveness mapping exercise.
This involves asking participants to think about and name actors (rather than named
individuals) that they think have or should have a role in contributing to their safety (including
perpetrators, local government agencies, police, justice agencies, school, family, etc.). Next
participants should be asked to rate the stakeholders identified based on how much they trust
them, from very untrustworthy, untrustworthy, to trusted, and very trusted; and based on how
effective they are, from very effective, effective, to ineffective, and very ineffective. Finally,
briefly explore why participants hold these feelings and examine how much contact different
groups have with the identified stakeholders. This simple exercise can be a valuable way to
identify the institutions, groups, and individuals that various community groups see as
responsible for contributing to their safety and assess the level of public confidence in these
institutions, groups, and individuals.
b. Surveys
Surveys can be a valuable way to assess facts, behaviours and perceptions related to urban
safety and governance. The main advantage of surveys is that it allows for standardised
responses which, in turn, enables quick and easy analysis and the opportunity to easily
compare various stakeholder groups. In addition, compared to focus groups and interviews,
surveys can often be less time-consuming which means that many questions can be asked
on a subject providing the assessment team with greater flexibility in their analysis. While they
cannot replace focus groups, surveys can act as a useful complement to the open-ended
responses that focus group discussions elicit. Surveys can be conducted face-to-face, over
the telephone, and can also be self-administered online. The choice of the type of survey
needs to consider the scope of the questions being asked, the time and resources available
for primary data collection, and the target population(s).
A cost-effective way of conducting surveys could be by asking key informants and participants
of focus group discussions to also complete a survey. This would not only yield the benefits
described above but would also provide a means to validate the responses from interviews
and focus group discussions.