James Madison University
JMU Scholarly Commons
/.$*)'+ $'$-. 4 ,/. #**'
/(( ,
Sense of belonging among middle school students
Alexis Carson
James Madison University
*''*0.#$-)$.$*)'0*,&-. #5+-*((*)-'$%(/ / -+
,.*!.# -2#*'*"2*((*)-
4$-4 -$-$-,*/"#..*2*/!*,!, )*+ ) --2.# 4 ,/. #**'.#*','2*((*)-.#- ) +. !*,$)'/-$*)$)
/.$*)'+ $'$-.2)/.#*,$3 ($)$-.,.*,*!#*','2*((*)-*,(*, $)!*,(.$*)+' - *).. ($)%(/ /
*(( ) $..$*)
,-*)' 1$- )- *! '*)"$)"(*)"($' -#**'-./ ).- Educational Specialist
#5+-*((*)-'$%(/ / -+
Sense of Belonging Among Middle School Students
Alexis Carson
A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of
JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY
In
Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
For the degree of
Educational Specialist
School Psychology
August 2014
ii
Table of Contents
List of Tables …………………………………………………………………...……......iv
List of Figures and Charts ……………………………………………………….…….....v
Abstract …………………………………………………..………………………………vi
I. Review of Literature…….………………………………………………………………1
Introduction
Gender
Grade Level
Academic Achievement
Educational Classification
Socioeconomic Status
School Completion
II. Research Design and Methodology…………………………...………………………10
Purpose of the Study
Research Questions and Statement of Hypotheses
Design
Sample
Setting
Procedures
Data Collection
Instrument
Data Analysis
III. Results…………………………………………………..……………………………21
IV. Discussion……………………………………………………………………………29
Findings
Limitations
Implications for Future Research and for Educators
iii
V. Appendices…………………………………………………………………...……….37
A. Parent/Guardian Informed Consent
B. Child Assent Form
C. Psychological Sense of School Membership Scale with additional questions
iv
List of Tables
Table 1. Subject Composition by Gender and Grade Level
Table 2. Subject Composition by Academic Achievement and Educational Classification
Table 3. 2013 Virginia and Participating School Systems dropout rate by student gender,
disability, and economically disadvantaged classification.
Table 4. Descriptive Statistics for Student Responses to Psychological Sense of School
Membership Scale and Additional Questions
Table 5. Descriptive Statistics for Student Responses to Belonging Subscale Items
Table 6. Descriptive Statistics for Student Responses to Rejection Subscale Items
Table 7. Descriptive Statistics for Student Responses to Acceptance Subscale Items
Table 8. Mean and Standard Deviations of Additional Questions
Table 9. Mean and Standard Deviations of School Belonging by Gender
Table 10. School Belonging Mean Scores by Grade Level
Table 11. School Belonging Mean Scores by Grade Point Average
Table 12. School Belonging Mean Scores Lunch Eligibility
v
List of Charts
Chart 1. Subject Description by Socioeconomic Status Defined by Lunch Eligibility
vi
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to explore the perceptions of school belonging
among middle school students and contributing factors that may affect their perceptions
of belonging. Specific contributing factors that were identified for this project include
gender, grade level, GPA, education classification, and socioeconomic status. The
participating students were 13 middle school students within a rural community.
A 21 item school membership questionnaire adapted from the Psychological
Sense of School Membership Scale (Goodenow, 1993) was used to assess the
participant’s perceptions of belonging, rejection and acceptance within their school, as
well as their participation in school related extracurricular activities and their likelihood
to graduate from high school and desire to further their education. Participants within this
study reported having an overall belonging score of 3.22 (SD = .15) on a scale ranging
from “1 = not at all true” to “5 = completely true”. These findings indicated that the
participants had a neutral or moderate level of overall sense of school belonging. Survey
responses also suggest that participants had moderate rejection and acceptance scores.
Responses to the two additional questions relating to the likelihood of completing
high school and continuing on to further their education revealed consistent high level
results. Responses to the third additional question suggested that many of the participants
participate in at least one extracurricular activity at their school.
Due to so few participants, inferential statistical analyses including significance
levels of the factors that were identified to be explored within this study could not be
performed or reported.
The current study’s findings can provide the participating middle school with a
platform of information regarding school belong within their school. The tool developed
vii
from the Psychological Sense of School Membership Scale can be used on a much larger
sample size within the school to obtain a more accurate representation of the students’
sense of school belonging.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Introduction
Many educators and researchers agree that one of the most fundamental reforms
needed in education is to make schools a better community, providing care and support
for all young people (Hargreaves, Earl, & Ryan, 1996). According to Solomon, Watson,
Battistich, Schaps, & Delucchi (1996), the term “community” can be defined in different
ways, but a commonality among all definitions includes the concept of belongingness.
They go on to say that community is not present until its members experience feelings of
belonging, trust in others, and safety. It is important that in a school community the
students, teachers, administrators and all other members value their community and that
everyone feels that their community values them. Students’ feeling of being accepted,
respected, included, and supported by others in their school is described as their sense of
belonging (Goodenow, 1993). Goodenow tells us that school belonging refers to a
student’s sense of belonging or psychological membership in the school or classroom.
The concept of school belonging involves support and respect for personal autonomy and
for the student as an individual.
Maslow (1968) identified ‘belonging’ as a psychological concept. He suggested
that human beings have a hierarchy of needs ranging from lower level needs for survival
and safety to higher level needs for intellectual achievement and self - fulfillment.
According to Maslow, each of the lower needs must be met before any of the higher
needs can be addressed. Maslow (1970) called the four lower level needs (survival,
safety, belonging, and self-esteem) deficiency needs. It was believed, that until these
needs were met, individuals could not achieve the additional levels of Maslow’s
2
hierarchical needs. Today, Maslow’s theory suggesting a sense of belonging is an
important human need is generally accepted (Osterman, 2000).
Since the idea of having a sense of belonging is now widely recognized as a basic
and important human need, there has been a recent focus on how an increased sense of
school belonging can impact a child or adolescents achievement within school. Osterman
(2000) tells us that despite research indicating the importance of a sense of school
belonging, little attention is paid to the social and emotional needs of students, but rather,
priority is given to their performance in national examinations. She goes on to say that
indicated by the nation-wide emphasis on standardized achievement tests, academic
accomplishment is the main priority while little formal attention is given to the affective
needs of students. She further states that this leads to the shaping of school culture,
beliefs, and practices that nurture individualism and competition, rather than community
and collaboration (2000). Osterman indicates that central to this culture are organizational
policies and practices that systematically prevent and impede the development of
community among students and directly contribute to students' experience of isolation,
alienation, and polarization.
In her review of school belonging, Osterman stated that students who have a sense
of school belonging were more likely to show higher levels of interest in school, higher
expectations of success and less anxiety. Further, children who have a sense of belonging
perceived themselves to be more competent with higher levels of intrinsic motivation
than their peers who do not have a strong sense of belonging. Being accepted, included,
or welcomed leads to positive emotions, such as happiness, elation, contentment, and
3
calm. Conversely, being rejected, excluded, or ignored can often lead to intense negative
feelings of anxiety, depression, grief jealousy, and loneliness (Osterman, 2000).
Current research shows that school belonging is an important construct that is
closely related to school engagement and school performance in students. Given the
amount of time children spend in educational settings and the societal importance
attached to school-related activities, students' sense of belonging in those settings is
particularly important for their healthy development (Goodenow, 1993). There is
increasing evidence that students’ experience of belonging to their school, including close
relationships with school social groups, individuals within the school, and school based
activities significantly facilitate motivation and academic achievement (Ryan & Stiller,
1994).
School belonging develops as the student experiences positive interactions with
peers, teachers, and other members of their school community. Student teacher
relationships, peer relationships, and involvement in school activities are key social
experiences that tie students to their schools allowing enhancement of motivation and
academic achievement (Osterman, 2000). Having a strong sense of belonging requires the
students to establish a social bond among themselves, teachers, and the norms governing
schooling institutions (Wehlage, G. G., Rutter, R. A., Smith, G. A, 1989).
Gender
Some researchers have reported differences in the sense of school belonging in
terms of characteristics of the students themselves. For example, there is some evidence
that, among adolescents; girls tend to report higher levels of school belonging than do
boys (Anderman, 2002).
4
According to Goodenow (1993); girls report a greater sense of belonging in
schools than boys. We also know that the relationship between expectancies for success
and sense of belonging are stronger for female students than their male peers in middle
school (Goodenow, 1993). In 2002, results from a longitudinal study by Smerdon
showed that high school females have a greater sense of belonging than their male peers.
Goodenow explained these gender differences by referring to the varying socialization
processes of girls versus that of boys. Gilligan (1982) argued that relatedness and
connection with others is more important for girls, whereas competition is a more central
factor for boys. Given that female adolescents tend to report a greater sense of school
belonging than male adolescents (Goodenow 1993 & Smerdon 2002), and that the
relationship between sense of belonging and academic motivation is stronger for females
(Goodenow), it might be that sense of belonging is more strongly related to academic
outcomes for females than for males.
Grade Level
Goodenow (1993) found that the beginning of secondary education is the most
critical stage for the development of sense of belonging. She tells us that this is the stage
when students are in transition from childhood to adolescence.
According to Rumberger & Thomas, people often predict that belonging increases
as the student spends more time at their middle school getting to know the institution,
teachers, and peers. They go on to say that alternatively, some data have suggested that
many adolescent’s sense of alienation may increase across middle school and early high
school years (2000).
5
According to Baumeister and Leary, people have an innate need to belong to
social groups and to form positive interpersonal relationships with others (1995). Given
the range of positive academic, social, and emotional outcomes associated with students
having a strong sense of school belonging, it is important to understand factors that
support this perception.
Academic Achievement
Academic underachievement of students in the United States is a major concern
for many of the parents and educators of students today. In terms of individual
characteristics, students' beliefs about the academic work presented in their classes and
their self-concepts also are related to their sense of belonging. Similarly, adolescents with
lower levels of academic achievement may be less likely to report a sense of belonging
than their higher-achieving peers. According to Wigfield and Eccles (1994), a strong
global self-concept and high perceived task values such as the students’ perception that
tasks are interesting, important, and useful, are strongly associated with higher levels of
belonging.
According to Goodenow (1993) and Booker (2007), although feeling of school
membership and belonging is important for all students, it may be an important factor in
supporting academic achievement especially of disadvantaged students. Osterman’s
(2000) literature review indicated that a sense of school belonging can have positive
impacts upon academic achievements for students. Further research demonstrates that a
positive sense of school belonging predicts other academic outcomes in addition to
academic performance. Roeser, Midgley, & Urdan, (1996) write that a sense of
belonging is found to be positively related to academic self-efficacy, positive school
6
affect, academic effort (Goodenow, 1993), educational expectations (Smerdon, 2002),
and the amount of time spent on homework (Hagborg, 1998).
Educational Classification
For students with disabilities, peer-related stressors such as exclusion by peers
and a lack of peer and staff support can decrease the students’ sense of school belonging
(Doubt & McColl, 2003). Studies have found that teenagers with physical disabilities
experience more loneliness and isolation in schools than their nondisabled peers
(Armstrong, Rosenbaum, & King, 1992). According to Stevens, Steele, Jutai, Kalninsi,
Borolussi, & Biggar. (1996), disabled adolescents reported having good relationships at
school, but decreased contact with peers outside of school. Parmenter and Knox (1991),
suggested that the school relationships reflected acquaintanceship rather than friendship.
Sabornie (1994) found that middle school-age students with a learning disability received
lower teacher rated social competence, higher self-reported levels of loneliness,
anonymity, victimization, and lower levels of school participation. This tells us that
school membership and a sense of belonging would have a special relevance for this
group of vulnerable and at risk students.
One of the most vulnerable populations for school dropout consists of students
with disabilities. According to Reschly and Christenson (2006), students with learning
disabilities or emotional or behavioral disorders are consistently found to have the highest
dropout incidence among special education students and students in general. Bond,
Butler, Thomas, Carlin, Glover, Bowes, & Patton, G. (2007) found that adolescents who
reported low school connectedness or sense of belonging in early secondary school were
7
more likely to have mental health problems such as depression, drop out of school and
engage in substance misuse in later years.
Inclusive versus non-inclusive education is an important factor when considering
the sense of school belonging for children with special needs. According to Frederickson,
inclusive education can be defined at its most basic level as educating children with
special educational needs in mainstream schools, alongside typically developing peers
(2008). She goes on to say that a major drive towards educational inclusion has been the
concern that children who were placed in special education classrooms were at a
disadvantage to their mainstream peers, due to lack of contact with non-special education
students, and restricted access to the mainstream curriculum and educational practices
(2008). Warnock (2005) tells us that engendering a sense of community and belonging is
an important aspect of inclusion due to its functional importance for successful learning
and general well-being.
There have been few studies that have examined outcomes associated with school
belonging among students with disabilities, suggesting that more research is needed to
understand how school experiences influence outcomes for students with disabilities.
Socioeconomic Status
Trusty and Dooley-Dickey's (1993) study indicated that low socioeconomic status
students reported lower levels of perceived membership (measured by both belonging
and a commitment to work and school) than did their peers. Goodenow (1993) also found
that students of low socioeconomic status reported lower levels of belonging.
A study by Smerdon (1999), found that socioeconomic status also plays a major
role in a student’s sense of school belonging. It was found that students from families of
8
higher socioeconomic status are more likely to have higher levels of school belonging.
The study also showed that these students tend to be more engaged in school activities as
well. According to Steinberg et al (1992), generally younger male students, adolescents
from higher socioeconomic backgrounds, and adolescents with more authoritative parents
reported attachment to their school and higher value of their education.
School Completion
A students’ lack of sense of belonging to their school can lead to negative social,
emotional, and educational outcomes for that student. In a review of empirical studies on
the growth and nature of juvenile gangs, Burnett and Walz (1994) conclude that gang-
related problems increase when students do not have a sense of belonging to their school.
Fine (1991) tells us that lacking a sense of belonging is a direct cause of dropping out of
school. Finn (1989) described the process by which some students become alienated
from, and eventually drop out of, school. He suggests that a sense of belonging combined
with identification with your school leads to an increase in the quality, as well as the
quantity, of students' participation in school activities. He goes on to say that such
increased participation, combined with quality instruction, can lead to successful
performance and achievement which, in turn, contributes to a greater sense of
identification (1989).
More recently, school completion has become a high-stakes issue for schools and
school districts. Factors that have been identified as contributing to early school exit;
include below average family income, mental health problems, academic difficulties, and
poor interpersonal relationships in school (Finn; & Voelkl, 1993). Researchers commonly
have reported that dropping out is most likely to occur when a history of academic
9
failure, truancy, and misconduct are accompanied by environmental variables such as;
low income, early parenthood, and substance abuse problems (Alexander, 2001).
Christenson (2001) defined drop-out as “a process of disengaging from school,
not a discrete event or instantaneous student decision (pp. 472).” Many other researchers
have agreed with Christenson stating that dropping out of school is a developmental
process (Fredricks, Blumenfeld, & Paris, 2004; Jimerson, Egeland, Sroufe & Carlson,
2000).
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY
Purpose of the Study
The purpose of this study was to explore contributing factors that may affect the
perceptions of middle school students sense of school belonging. Factors identified for
this study include gender, grade level, academic achievement measured by grade point
average (GPA), education classification (regular education or special education), and
socioeconomic status (SES) measured by free, reduced, or full price lunch eligibility.
Research Questions and Statement of Hypotheses
The following questions and hypothesis were addressed in this study.
Research Question 1:
Is gender a contributing factor when measuring the perceptions of school belonging
among middle school students?
Research Question 2:
Is a student’s grade level a contributing factor when measuring the perceptions of school
belonging among middle school students?
Research Question 3:
Is academic achievement a contributing factor when measuring the perceptions of school
belonging among middle school students?
Research Question 4:
Is a student’s educational classification a contributing factor when measuring the
perceptions of school belonging among middle school students?
11
Research Question 5:
Is a student’s socioeconomic status a contributing factor when measuring the perceptions
of school belonging among middle school students?
I hypothesized that gender was a factor when measuring school belonging among
middle school students. I believed that female middle school students are more likely to
feel a stronger connection to their school than their male peers. I hypothesized that
academic achievement was a factor when measuring school belonging, indicating that
students with higher grade point averages had a stronger sense of belonging than their
peers with lower academic success. I hypothesized that grade level also served as a factor
in measuring school belonging at the middle school level, indicating that the higher the
grade level, the more connected the student feels to their school. I also believed that a
student’s educational classification was a factor when measuring a sense of school
belonging. I hypothesized that regular education students are likely to have a stronger
sense of school belonging than their special education classification peers. A final factor
contributing to school belonging is socioeconomic status. I hypothesized that students
who are more affluent and pay full price for school lunch had a greater sense of
belonging that there less affluent peers who receive free or reduced price lunch.
Sample
The sample was composed of students in a rural Southwest Virginia school
system during the 2013-2014 school year. Voluntary student participants were recruited
for this study once permission to conduct the research was received by James Madison
University’s Institutional Review Board.
12
Participants were a sample of convenience. Sixth, seventh, and eighth grade
students who attended a local middle school Southwest Virginia were asked to
participate.
Students were invited to participate in the study. Parents of 13 students (6.70%)
returned the signed informed parental consent forms to approve their children’s
participation in the study. Sixth grade (n = 9, 69.2%) and female students (n = 11, 84.6%)
represented the characteristics of the majority of the study participants. Students with a
3.0 grade point average or higher represented the majority of participants (n = 12,
92.3%), while all participants were regular education students (non-special education
students) (n = 13, 100%).
In addition, most of the study participants were from families with high
socioeconomic status, with 69.2 % of the study participants (n = 9) paying full price for
school lunch.
The following tables and chart provide the participants description by gender and
grade level, academic achievement and education classification, and socioeconomic
status defined by free/reduced lunch eligibility.
13
Table 1. Subject Composition by Gender and Grade Level
Gender
Male
Female
Total
Grade Level
n (%)
n (%)
n (%)
Sixth
2 (15.4)
7 (53.8)
9 (69.2)
Seventh
0 (0)
4 (30.8)
4 (30.8)
Eighth
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
Total
2 (15.4)
11 (84.6)
13 (100.0)
Table 2. Subject Composition by Academic Achievement and Educational Classification
Education
Classification
Regular
Education
Special
Education
Total
Grade Point Average
n (%)
n (%)
n (%)
3.0-4.0
12 (92.3)
0 (0)
12 (92.3)
2.0-2.9
1 (7.7)
0 (0)
0 (7.7)
1.0-1.9
0
0 (0)
0 (0)
0.0-0.9
0
0 (0)
0 (0)
Total
13 (100.0)
0 (0)
0 (100.0)
14
Chart 1. Subject Description by Socioeconomic Status Defined by Lunch Eligibility
The results of this project were coded in such a way that the respondent’s identity
was not attached to the final form of this study. All data was stored in a locked and secure
location accessible only to the researcher. Upon completion of the study, all information
that matched up individual respondents with their answers was destroyed.
Setting
This study took place in a middle school in a rural community in Southwest
Virginia. In 2013, The Virginia Department of Education reported that participating
school systems dropout rate was 12.4% for the 2012-2013 school year. Previous data
from the Virginia Department of Education indicates that the systems dropout rate has
decreased steadily over the past several years, but still greatly exceeds the Virginia state
average of 5.9% (2013).
Although the participating school system is making gains in their overall
graduation rate, there are discrepancies among student subgroups compared to the state
69% (n = 9)
8% (n = 1)
23% (n = 3)
Full Price Lunch Reduced Lunch Free Lunch
15
average (Virginia Department of Education, 2013). In particular, students in the 2013
graduating class identified as having a disability and students identified as being
economically disadvantaged in the participating school system had higher dropout rates
than the state average (Virginia Department of Education, 2013). The following table
shows the participating school systems dropout rate compares to the state of Virginia’s
dropout rate by student gender, students identified with a disability, and students
identified as economically disadvantaged within the 2013 graduating class.
Table 3. 2013 Virginia and the participating school systems dropout rate by student
gender, disability, and economically disadvantaged classification.
%
Virginia
Participating School
System
All Students
5.9
12.4
Female
4.6
13.2
Male
7.2
11.6
Students with Disabilities
10.5
16.3
Economically Disadvantaged
11.2
17.9
Source from Virginia Department of Education (Class of 2013 State Level and District
Cohort Report, retrieved April, 2014).
16
Procedures
The study involved the following steps and related activities:
1. The student researcher obtained a site approval letter from participating school
systems Superintendent and the school principal.
2. Prior to conducting the investigation, the student researcher obtained research
approval through the James Madison University’s Institutional Review Board
application process.
3. After consent was obtained from the Institutional Review Board, a letter
explaining the study was sent to 16 homeroom teachers at the middle school.
4. Since the participants in the study were minors, the student researcher and the
guidance counselor distributed parent/guardian consent forms to 194 students.
The parental consent form shown in Appendix A was sent home with each
student.
5. Once parental consent was received, participating student records were reviewed
by the student researcher using the online databases of PowerSchool and IEP
Online.
6. A student survey enclosed with a student assent form was given to each student
whose parents or guardians consented to their participation. Distribution of the
survey was made by the student researcher and the guidance counselor. Students
completed and returned the surveys in a sealed envelope to the guidance
counselor.
17
7. Descriptive statistical analyses of collected data were completed. The initial
identified research analyses required inferential statistical data analyses, but due
to so few participants, descriptive statistical analyses were more appropriate.
8. Results from data analysis and discussions related to the study were reported.
Data Collection
This study used quantitative and descriptive data to explore the participant’s self-
reported feelings of belonging, rejection, and acceptance in relation to identified
independent variables. Participating students’ demographic information was obtained
from online record data base systems. Due to so few participants, the proposed research
analyses were not conducted, but rather only descriptive analyses of the results were
examined.
Students in selected homeroom classrooms were presented with an information
sheet (parent/guardian consent form). Sixteen homeroom classrooms were chosen with a
total of 194 students. Homeroom is a period of time in the morning before the school day
begins that allows time for any non-academic activities or events to take place. This time
was chosen so that the researcher would not take away from academic instruction of the
students. After presenting students with the parent/guardian informed consent, the
researcher reviewed information about the study and answered any present questions.
After parent consent was obtained, the student assent form was given to those students
who were granted parental permission to participate. Upon completion of student assent
form, the questionnaire was then distributed to participating students. The participants
were then notified that their participation was completely optional, but all were
encouraged to participate.
18
Student participation in the study was encouraged by the researcher and the
guidance counselor. The deadline for students to return parental/guardian consent forms
was extended for 30 days. Multiple attempts were made to remind the homeroom
teachers to encourage their classes to participate. Several teachers reported that the time
of the school year and teacher “buy-in” was a concern for many teachers at the school.
Instrument
For this study, the Psychological Sense of School Membership Scale was used to
measure the participating students’ sense of school belonging (Goodenow, 1993). This
scale is a paper and pencil self-report survey. The original questionnaire consists of 18
questions. Responses to the questionnaire are in a 5-point Likert scale format, ranging
from 1= Not at all true to 5 = Completely true.
The Psychological Sense of School Membership Scale has been widely used to
measure students’ school membership and sense of school belonging (Booker, 2007).
The statistical reliability and validity of the Psychological Sense of School Membership
Scale are supported by previous investigations (Goodenow, 1993; Hagborg, 1993 &
1994; and McKay, 2007).
Coefficient alphas of the total score of the Psychological Sense of School
Membership Scale ranged from .77 (Goodenow, 1993) to .92 (McKay, 2007). According
to Goodenow (1993), construct validity of the scale has been established through a series
of 43 contrast-group comparisons and correlations involving recentness of student
enrollment, school attendance, school location (urban versus suburban), and student
social status, motivation, and grades. Evidence has been reported by Hagborg (1994),
suggesting correlations found in the areas of self-concept, grades, homework time, social-
19
emotional distress, and student perceptions of school climate. His study indicated that
overall, students with higher school membership were found to be more motivated, to
have more positive self-concept, to experience greater school satisfaction, to have higher
academic performance, and to report greater school commitment, more positive teacher-
student relations, and lower social emotional distress (Hagborg, 1994).
The Psychological Sense of School Membership Scale was designed to measure
three specific factors including: belonging (e.g., “I am included in a lot of activities at this
school.”), rejection (e.g., “It is hard for people like me to be accepted here.”), and
acceptance (e.g., “I can really be myself at this school.”).
For the purpose of this study, 3 additional questions were added to the survey to
gather further information about the participants. Additional questions included extent of
participants’ participation in school related extracurricular activities, their desire to
graduate from high school, and their higher education expectations.
Data Analysis
Descriptive analyses of data were conducted to address each research question
and to explore the perceptions of school belonging among participating students. Due to
the lack of participants, inferential statistical analyses of the data were not appropriate.
Means and standard deviations were reported to describe the overall degree of
sense of school belonging, feelings of rejection, and feelings of acceptance reported by
participating students who completed the Psychological Sense of School Membership
Survey. Item level means and standard deviations were also reported for the three
additional questions were added to the original survey. Means and standard deviations
were also reported describing sense of belonging related to the independent variables of
20
gender, grade level, academic achievement, educational classification, and
socioeconomic status.
RESULTS
The overall degree of school belonging reported by middle school students was
examined. The following table shows descriptive statistics for participating students’
responses to the survey.
Table 4. Descriptive Statistics for Student Responses to Psychological Sense of School
Membership Scale Items and Additional Questions
Question
N
Mean
SD
1
13
3.23
.59
2
13
3.15
.69
3
13
3.54
.66
4
13
3.15
.56
5
13
3.15
.56
6
13
3.00
.82
7
13
3.54
.52
8
13
3.15
.56
9
13
2.23
.83
10
13
3.54
.52
11
13
3.15
.56
12
13
4.00
.82
13
13
2.54
.52
14
13
3.62
.51
15
13
3.31
.63
16
13
4.00
.71
22
17
13
4.00
.82
19
13
4.92
.28
20
13
4.92
.28
21
13
2.85
1.07
When looking at the belonging subscale of the Psychological Sense of School
Membership Scale, students reported a mean of 3.22 (SD = .15). This scale ranges from
“1 = not at all true “to “5 = completely true”. High scores on this scale represent a higher
level of school belonging perceived by the students, while lower scores represent a lower
level of school belonging. Students reported a mean score of 2.54 ( SD = .52) on the item
stating “I can really be myself at my school”. This score was an outlier on this subscale
and was not in line with the consistently reported neutral or moderate responses of the
participants’ feelings of belonging. The following table includes descriptive statistics for
student responses to each item on the belonging scale.
23
Table 5. Descriptive Statistics for Student Responses to Belonging Subscale Items
Question
N
Mean
SD
1
13
3.23
.59
2
13
3.15
.69
4
13
3.15
.56
5
13
3.15
.56
7
13
3.54
.52
8
13
3.15
.56
9
13
2.23
.83
10
13
3.54
.52
11
13
3.15
.56
13
13
2.54
.52
14
13
3.62
.50
15
13
3.31
.63
18
13
4.15
.80
Participating students reported a mean of 3.51 (SD = 0.5) on the rejection
subscale of the Psychological Sense of School Membership Scale. This scale also ranges
from “1 = not at all true “to “5 = completely true” with high scores indicating higher level
24
feelings of rejection by students, while lower scores represent lower level feelings of
rejection. For this scale, all three items were reverse scored when performing the
statistical analysis. Students reported a mean score of 4.00 (SD = .82) on the item stating
“I feel very different from most other students at my school”. This score was an outlier
on this subscale and was not consistent with other responses. The following table
includes descriptive statistics for student responses to each item on the rejection scale.
Table 6. Descriptive Statistics for Student Responses to Rejection Subscale Items
Question
N
Mean
SD
3
13
3.54
.66
6
13
3.00
.82
12
13
4.00
.82
Responses to the acceptance subscale revealed a mean of 3.71 (SD =0.38). This
scale, like the previous scales also ranges from “1 = not at all true “to “5 = completely
true” with high scores indicating higher level feelings of acceptance, while lower scores
represent lower level feelings of acceptance. Students reported a mean score of 4.00 (SD
= .71) on the item stating “I wish I were in a different school”. This score was an outlier
on this subscale and was not consistent with other responses from the participants. The
following table includes descriptive statistics for student responses to each item on the
acceptance scale.
25
Table 7. Descriptive Statistics for Student Responses to Acceptance Subscale Items
Question
N
Mean
SD
1
13
3.23
.59
14
13
3.62
.50
16
13
4.00
.71
17
13
4.00
.82
Responses to the additional questions that were added to the original
Psychological Sense of School Membership scale revealed that the students who
participated in the study have a strong desire to complete high school and later attend
college or another form of higher education after high school. Results also suggest that
many of the participants of this study are participating in extracurricular activities at their
school. The following table presents means and standard deviations for each additional
question added to the original survey.
Table 8. Mean and Standard Deviations of Additional Questions
Question
N
M
SD
I am confident that I will
graduate from high School.
13
4.92
.27
I have plans to attend college
or any form of higher
education after high school
13
4.92
.27
26
Question
N
M
SD
How many extracurricular
school activities do you
participate in?
13
2.85
1.07
Descriptive analyses of results by gender and the belonging subscale of the
Psychological Sense of School Membership Scale revealed no differences between
female and male students participating in the study. Perceptions of school belonging were
nearly identical for male and female students. The following table presents the means and
standard deviations for each gender.
Table 9. Mean and Standard Deviations of School Belonging by Gender
Descriptive analyses of results by grade level and the belonging subscale revealed
that there were slight differences in grade level and reported feelings of belonging of the
participants in the study. Sixth grade students reported a slightly larger belonging average
than their seventh grade peers. There were no eighth grade students who participated in
this study. The following table presents the means and standard deviations for each of
the grade levels.
Gender
N
M
SD
Male
2
3.23
0
Female
11
3.22
0.17
27
Table 10. School Belonging Mean Scores by Grade Level
Grade
N
M
SD
6
9
3.26
0.10
7
4
3.15
0.23
8
0
-
-
Descriptive analyses of results by grade point average and the belonging subscale
were computed as well. These results revealed that there was minimal difference in
responses from participants based on their grade point average. The majority of
participants had a GPA of 3.0 or higher. The only participant with a GPA of 2.0-2.9
reported a slightly higher average sense of belonging score. The following table shows
the means and standard deviations for the different grade point averages.
Table 11. School Belonging Mean Scores by Grade Point Average
GPA
N
M
SD
3.0-4.0
12
3.18
0.56
2.0-2.9
1
3.38
0.22
1.0-1.9
0
-
-
0.00-0.9
0
-
-
28
No participants were identified as special education students during the time of
this research, therefore a subscale comparison could not be made for this category.
Finally, descriptive analyses of results by socioeconomic status and the belonging
subscale of the Psychological Sense of School Membership Scale were compared. These
results revealed minimal differences between students who are eligible for free, reduced,
or pay full price for lunch. The following table shows the means and standard deviations
of the belonging subscale scores by student groups relative to their lunch assistance
eligibility.
Table 12. School Belonging Mean Scores by Lunch Eligibility
Lunch Status
N
M
SD
Free
3
3.20
0.08
Reduced Price
1
3.23
-
Full Price
9
3.23
0.18
DISCUSSION
The purpose of this study was to explore contributing factors that may affect the
perceptions of middle school students sense of school belonging. Because of the very
small response rate and the very limited range of participants, several variables of interest
could not be adequately examined.
Results show that the participants reported having a moderate overall school
belonging score 3.22 (SD = .15) on a scale ranging from “1 = not at all true” to “5 =
completely true”. High scores on this scale represent a higher level of school belonging
perceived by the students, while lower scores represent a lower level of school belonging.
Previous studies show that high achieving students and students with higher
socioeconomic status demonstrate a greater sense of belonging to their school than their
lower achieving and lower socioeconomic status peers. In the case of this current study,
this difference could not be determined because of the low numbers of lower achieving
students. Higher achieving students indicated that they have an overall moderate sense of
belonging to their school. Research suggests that this score should be higher for these
particular students. In response to a specific belonging subscale item on the survey
stating, “I can really be myself at my school”, participants reported a mean score of 2.54
on a scale that ranged from “1 = not at all true “to “5 = completely true”. This suggests
that higher achieving students do not feel that they can be themselves within this
particular school. All other belonging sub-scale items mean scores suggest neutral sense
of belonging among participants.
Previous studies show that special education students report experiencing more
loneliness and isolation than regular education students (Armstrong, Rosenbaum, &
30
King, 1992). Due to all participants in this current study being regular education
students, this information could not be supported by the current study. Sabornie (1994)
also tells us that middle school-age students identified with a learning disability report
having lower levels of school participation than their regular education peers. Lack of
participation from special education students in this current study may be reflective of the
lack of school participation from this population found in previous studies. Also, the two
participating homeroom classrooms may not have included special education students.
Results from the current study also indicate that participating students reported a
moderate score, with a mean of 3.51 (SD = 0.5) on the rejection subscale of the
Psychological Sense of School Membership Scale. This scale also ranges from “1 = not at
all true “to “5 = completely true” with high scores indicating higher level feelings of
rejection by students, while lower scores represent lower level feelings of rejection.
Results from previous studies show that students with greater academic
achievement report having more positive school affect (Roeser, Midgley, & Urdan,
1996). All participants in the current study were students who demonstrate moderate to
high academic achievement. These students reporting a moderate rejection subscale score
is not consistent with pervious research indicating lower levels of rejection from this
population. In response to a specific item on the survey stating, “I feel very different from
most other students at my school”, participants reported a mean score of 4.00 on a scale
that ranged from “1 = not at all true “to “5 = completely true”. With all current
participants being higher academically achieving students, this indicates that students
who make good grades feel different than others in their school. Being a high achieving
31
student at this particular school is not viewed as a rewarding quality and these students do
not feel like they are like their peers.
Other items on the rejection sub-scale include “It’s hard for people like me to be
accepted at my school” and “Sometimes I feel as if I don’t belong in my school. Mean
item scores for the current study for these particular questions were 3.54 and 3.00,
respectively. This suggests that the participants in this study, who are all moderate to high
achieving students, feel that it is slightly harder for them to be accepted in their school
than their peers.
Literature also tells us that belonging tends to increase as students spend more
time at their middle school getting to know the institution, teachers, and peers
(Rumberger & Thomas, 2000). With nearly 70% of the participants in the current study
being sixth grade students, reported moderately high levels of rejection are consistent
with results found in previous studies, but there were not enough upper grade level
participants in the current study to make this comparison.
We were also able to determine that responses to the acceptance subscale revealed
a mean of 3.71 (SD =0.38). This scale, like the previous two scales also ranges from “1 =
not at all true “to “5 = completely true” with high scores indicating higher level feelings
of acceptance, while lower scores represent lower level feelings of acceptance. Results
from this scale demonstrated moderate scores as well.
Current reported moderate feelings of acceptance from higher academically
achieving students, as well as students who are from families with a higher
socioeconomic status is not consistent with what has been reported in previous studies.
32
Previous studies indicate that these particular students tend to have high levels of
acceptance within their schools, not only from their peers, but from their teachers as well.
On specific items on the survey that stated “I wish I were in a different school”
and “I feel proud to belong to my school”, participants reported an mean score of 4.00 on
a scale that ranged from “1 = not at all true “to “5 = completely true” on both items. This
suggests that although they may feel proud to attend their school, high achieving students
and students from families with higher socioeconomic status are not feeling accepted
within this particular school.
Responses to the two additional questions added to the survey relating to the
likelihood of completing high school and continuing on to further their education
revealed the same results. The participants answers suggested a high mean of 4.92 (SD =
.27) for both questions. Like the previous scales, these questions also ranged from “1 =
not at all true “to “5 = completely true”. This suggests that these students do expect to
graduate and intend to further their education beyond high school.
Previous studies indicate that a lack of sense of belonging is a direct cause of
dropping out of school (Finn, 1991). High mean scores on these two questions are
consistent with the literature that surrounds moderately high levels of reported belonging
and acceptance among regular education students who are primarily exceeding
academically. Research shows that regular education students as well as academically
achieving students have a stronger sense of school belonging (Reschly & Christenson,
2006 and Smerdon, 2002).
The third additional question was added to gather information on the importance
of students’ participation in school related extracurricular activities. Response from
33
participants resulted in a mean of 2.85 (SD = 1.07). This suggests that many of the
participants participate in at least one extracurricular activity at their school.
Osterman tells us that involvement in school activities entail key social
experiences that tie students to their schools. She goes on to say that this also enhances
motivation and academic achievement in the classroom (2000). Results from this
question are consistent with previous studies in that higher achieving students are likely
to be involved in extracurricular activities within their school, as well as displaying a
strong sense of belonging or acceptance.
This study was designed to investigate specific factors that may contribute to a
student’s sense of school belonging. Due to so few participants in the current study, it
cannot be determined if there were statistically significant differences among students
within the different groups that were selected as the independent variables for this study.
Being one of the primary feeder schools to the county’s largest high school, the
particular middle school that was selected for this study seemed to be the best location to
obtain information. Although the school has been open for many years, after the start of
the current school year, the school had a complete change in administration including a
new principal, guidance counselor, several new teachers, as well as elimination of the
assistant principal position due to consistent low state tests scores. It is felt by the
researcher that the abrupt changes in administration and staff was a contributing factor in
obtaining teacher investment or “buy in” for this study. The researcher also feels that the
pressures placed on the current teachers due to such low state test scores served as an
inhibiting factor as well. The only two participating homeroom teachers were teachers
whom the researcher knew personally prior to conducting research within the school. The
34
researcher believes that this increased their likelihood to encourage students to participate
in the study.
Participation in external research projects (from outside agencies, Universities
etc) is uncommon for this particular school system. According to school officials, the
middle school that was chosen for this study has never participated in any formal research
projects before. Several teachers who did not have any participating students reported
that they were not comfortable with certain items that were on the survey or with the
research project. The researcher feels that the research process may have been
intimidating to certain teachers, as well as parents who were not as familiar with research
and data collection. The community the school serves, is a very small, rural community
where it is not typical to share personal information or feelings with others who do not
reside within the community. Although the researcher is a member of the greater
community, she was likely seen by many as an “outsider” wanting to obtain personal
information and/or feelings from the smaller community and its members. Thus, it is
acknowledged that very limited information has been obtained in this study.
Limitations
This study was limited in many ways. The first limitation was sample size. The
total number of participants for this study was very small (N=13). Also, participants
were only chosen from one middle school. Therefore, specific statistical analyses could
not be completed. With such a small sample size, the findings should not be generalized
to all students within the school that participated in the study. In addition,
disproportionate group sizes of the independent variables that were chosen resulted in
inadequate representation of the students within the school that was chosen for this study.
35
The lack of teacher investment or “buy in” was likely a contributor to such low
numbers of participants. Teachers at this particular school are under high levels of stress
and pressure due to their students not achieving state standards. School and teacher
morale were not considered when choosing a participating school for this study.
Another limitation of this study includes participant recruitment. Participants were
minors whose parents voluntarily allowed them to participate. It is likely that the
outcomes only represent students who have greater parental support and motivation to
participate in school related activities that are not “required”.
Finally, this study did not account for transfer students or students who have been
retained. Transfer students will likely have less sense of belonging than other students
who have been at the school for a longer time. Also, students who have been retained
may surprisingly have a stronger sense of belonging to their school since they have been
there longer and have had a longer time to develop relationships with teachers and
administrators in the building.
Implications for Future research and Educators
A larger sample size will be necessary to determine if a students’ gender, grade
level, GPA, education classification, or socioeconomic status contributes to their sense of
school belonging. Also proportionate group sizes will also be necessary to generate
generalizable results.
The participants in this study were all regular education students. Perceptions of
school belonging from special education students within the school will be very
important to obtain for a closer look at the students’ sense of belonging to this particular
36
school. This will also be very impotent for this school system in particular, due to its high
dropout percentage for students identified as having a disability.
One important implication of research on school belonging for teachers is that
teachers need to recognize the value of their students' sense of belonging. This includes
their sense of belonging not only in their particular classroom, but in the entire school as
well. Being aware of individual students' sense of belonging, acceptance, and inclusion,
is an important first step in sustaining a students' academic and affective development
and well-being.
School psychologists’ are in schools to be of service to all children. It is important
that school officials are aware that school psychologists are important members of school
communities with advanced knowledge of how to support students' academic
performance and emotional well-being and are capable to lead efforts to increase the
sense of school belonging among all students. Some students are particularly vulnerable
to experiencing challenges and disruptions in their social and academic functioning
within their school. Unfortunately, barriers often exist that challenge teachers and school
administrators to connect with certain students. These particular students often display an
even greater need to feel included and connected to members in their school community.
School psychologists obtain a unique set of skills that can be utilized to assist
teachers and school administrators in connecting with their students as well as helping to
support their emotional well-being and increase their academic functioning. School
psychologists should remain committed in their efforts to reach out to all children and to
connect with disconnected students in hopes of increasing their sense of school
belonging.
37
Appendix A.
Parent/Guardian Informed Consent
Identification of Investigators & Purpose of Study
Your child is being asked to participate in a research study conducted by Alexis Carson,
M.A. from James Madison University. The purpose of this study is to help identify
factors that contribute to a student’s sense of belonging to their school. This study will
contribute to the researcher’s completion of her Education Specialist (Ed.S.) Thesis.
Research Procedures
Should you decide to allow your child to participate in this research study, you will be
asked to sign this consent form once all your questions have been answered to your
satisfaction. This study consists of a survey that will be administered to individual
participants in their homeroom class (this will not take away form academic time in the
classroom). Your child will be asked to provide answers to a series of questions related to
their sense of school belonging.
Time Required
Participation in this study will require 15 minutes of your child’s time.
Risks
The investigator does not perceive more than minimal risks from your child’s
involvement in this study (that is, no risks beyond the risks associated with everyday
life). If items on the survey generate any thoughts or concerns for participants, School
Counselors are available for any necessary follow up.
Benefits
Potential benefits from participation in this study include gaining insight on how
connected students at Jonesville Middle School feel to their school. There are no direct
benefits to the child for participating in this study.
Confidentiality
The results of this research will be presented in a classroom setting at James Madison
University. The results of this project will be coded in such a way that the respondent’s
38
identity will not be attached to the final form of this study. The researcher retains the
right to use and publish non-identifiable data. While individual responses are
confidential, aggregate data will be presented representing averages or generalizations
about the responses as a whole. The researcher is currently serving as School
Psychologist-Intern for Lee County Public Schools and has legal access to all student
records and files. Information from participating student’s files that will be accessed by
the School Psychologist-Intern for this research project are the following, Gender, Grade
Level, GPA, Lunch Classification (free, reduced, or full price), and Education
Classification (Regular Education or Special Education). This information will be used to
analyze information collected from the survey. All data will be stored in a locked and
secure location accessible only to the researcher. Upon completion of the study, all
information that matches up individual respondents with their answers will be destroyed.
Participation & Withdrawal
Your child’s participation is entirely voluntary. He/she is free to choose not to
participate. Should you and your child choose to participate, he/she can withdraw at any
time without consequences of any kind.
Questions about the Study
If you have questions or concerns during the time of your child’s participation in this
study, or after its completion or you would like to receive a copy of the final aggregate
results of this study, please contact:
Alexis Carson, M.A.
School Psychology
James Madison University
Lee County Public Schools, School Psychologist-Intern
Telephone: (276) 346-2107
Dr. Tammy Gilligan, Ph.D.
School Psychology
James Madison University
Telephone: (540)-568-6564
Questions about Your Rights as a Research Subject
Dr. David Cockley
Chair, Institutional Review Board
James Madison University
(540) 568-2834
39
Giving of Consent
I have read this consent form and I understand what is being requested of my child as a
participant in this study. I freely consent for my child to participate. I have been given
satisfactory answers to my questions. The investigator provided me with a copy of this
form. I certify that I am at least 18 years of age.
________________________________________________
Name of Child (Printed)
______________________________________
Name of Parent/Guardian (Printed)
______________________________________ ______________
Name of Parent/Guardian (Signed) Date
______________________________________ ______________
Name of Researcher (Signed) Date
40
Appendix B.
CHILD ASSENT FORM
IRB # 14-0116
ASSESSMENT OF SENSE OF SCHOOL BELONGING AMONG MIDDLE SCHOOL
STUDENTS
I would like to invite you to take part in this study. I am asking you because you are a
middle school student at Jonesville Middle School during the school year of 2013-2014.
In this study, I will try to learn more about middle school student’s sense of belonging to
their school. To do the study, I will ask you to complete a short survey about school
belonging. Participating in this study will not hurt you in any way.
Your parents have been notified and have given permission for you to take part in this
study.
Confidentiality
All collected information will stored securely and destroyed upon completion of research.
If items on the survey generate any thoughts or concerns for you, School Counselors are
available for any necessary follow up.
You do not have to be in this study if you do not want to. If you decide to participate in
the study, you can stop filling out the survey at any time.
If you have any questions at any time, please ask the researcher.
IF YOU PRINT YOUR NAME ON THIS FORM IT MEANS THAT YOU HAVE
DECIDED TO PARTICIPATE AND HAVE READ EVERYTHING THAT IS ON THIS
FORM. YOU AND YOUR PARENTS WILL BE GIVEN A COPY OF THIS FORM TO
KEEP.
41
_______________________________________________
___________________
Name of Child (printed)
Date
_______________________________________________
___________________
Signature of Investigator
Date
Alexis Carson, M.A.
School Psychology
James Madison University
Lee County Public Schools, School Psychologist-Intern
Telephone: (276) 346-2107
42
Appendix C.
Psychological Sense of School Membership Scale with additional questions
Circle the answer for each statement that is most true for you.
1= not at all true, to 5= completely true.
1) I feel like a part of my school
1
2
3
4
5
2) People at my school notice when I am good at something
1
2
3
4
5
3) It is hard for people like me to be accepted at my school?
1
2
3
4
5
4) Other students in my school take my opinions seriously.
1
2
3
4
5
5) Most teachers at my school are interested in me?
1
2
3
4
5
6) Sometimes I feel as if I don’t belong in my school.
1
2
3
4
5
7) There is at least one teacher or adult I can talk to in my
school if I have a problem.
1
2
3
4
5
8) People at my school are friendly to me.
1
2
3
4
5
9) Teachers here are not interested in people like me.
1
2
3
4
5
10) I am included in lots of activities at my school.
1
2
3
4
5
11) I am treated with as much respect as other students at my
school.
1
2
3
4
5
12) I feel very different from most other students at my
school.
1
2
3
4
5
13) I can really be myself at my school.
1
2
3
4
5
14) Teachers at my school respect me.
1
2
3
4
5
15) People at my school know that I can do good work.
1
2
3
4
5
16) I wish I were in a different school.
1
2
3
4
5
43
17) I feel proud to belong to my school.
1
2
3
4
5
18) Other students at my school like me the way I am.
1
2
3
4
5
19) I am confident that I will graduate from High School
1
2
3
4
5
20) I have plans to attend college or any form of Higher
Education after high school.
1
2
3
4
5
21) How many extracurricular school activates do you
participate in?
1
2
3
4
5
Items 3, 6, 9, 12, and 16 were reverse scored
44
References
Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Kabbani, N. S. (2001). The dropout process in life
course perspective: Early risk factors at home and school. Teachers College
Record, 103(5), 760-822.
Anderman, E. M. (2002). School effects on psychological outcomes during adolescence.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 795-809.
Armstrong, R. W., Rosenbaum, P. L., & King, B. A. (1992). Self-perceived social
function among disabled children in regular classrooms. Developmental and
Behavioral Pediatrics, 13, 11-16.
Blackorby, J., Edgar, E., & Kortering, L. (1991). A third of our youth: A look at the
problem of high school dropout among students with mild disabilities. Journal of
Special Education, 25 (1), 102-113.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal
attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117,
498-529.
Booker, K.C. (2007). Likeness, comfort, and tolerance: Examining African American
adolescents’ sense of school belonging. The Urban Review, 39(3), 301-317.
Bond L, Butler H, THOMAS L, Carlin J, Glover S, Bowes G, Patton G., 2007. Social and
School Connectedness in Early Secondary School as Predictors of Late Teenage
Substance Use, Mental Health, and Academic Outcomes. Journal of Adolescent
Health, 40, 357.e9 –357.e18
Burnett, G., Waltz, G. (1994). Gangs in the Schools. ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban
Education New York, N.Y.
45
Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., (2006). Best practices in fostering student
engagement. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school
psychology V (pp. 1099 – 1120). Washington, DC: National Association of
School Psychologists.
Christenson, S. L., Sinclair, M. F., Lehr, C. A., & Godber, Y. (2001). Promoting
successful school completion: Critical conceptual and methodological guidelines.
School Psychology Quarterly, 16(4), 468-484.
Doubt, L., & McColl, M.A.(2003).A secondary guy: Physically disabled teenagers in
secondary schools. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70,139–151.
Fine, M. (1991). Framing dropouts: Notes on the politics of an urban public high school.
Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research 59, 117–
142.
Finn, J., & Voelkl, K. (1993). School characteristics related to student engagement.
Journal of Negro Education, 62, 249–268.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential
of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-
109.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2008). Open hearts build lives: positive emotions, induced through
loving-kindness meditation, build consequential personal resources. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 95 (5), 1045−1062.
46
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: psychological theory and women's
development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.
Goodenow, C. (1993). The psychological sense of school membership among
adolescents: Scale development and educational correlates. Psychology in
Schools, 30, 79-90.
Hagborg, W. J. (1998). An investigation of a brief measure of school membership.
Adolescence, 33(130), 461-468.
Hargreaves, A. & Earl, L. (1990). Rights of Passage: A review of selected research about
schooling in the transition years. Toronto: Queens Printer for the Ontario Ministry
of Education.
Jimerson, S., Egeland, B., Sroufe, L. A., & Carlson, B. (2000). A prospective longitudinal
study of high school dropouts examining multiple predictors across development.
Journal of School Psychology, 38(6), 525-549.
Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a Psychology of Being. New York: D. Van Nostrand
Company.
Maslow, A. H. (1970a). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper & Row
McKay, E. A. (2007) Psychological sense of school membership mediates the
relationship between attachment and academic motivation in adolescents. Central
Connecticut State University.
Osterman, K. F. (2000). Students’ need for belonging in the school community. Review of
Educational Research, 70(3), 323-367.
47
Parmenter TR, Knox M. (1991). The post-school experiences of young people with a
disability. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 14(4):281-291
Roeser, R. W., Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. C. (1996). Perceptions of the school
psychological environment and early adolescents psychological and behavioral
functioning in school: The mediating role of goals and belonging. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 88, 408-422.
Rumberger, R. W., & Thomas, S. L. (2000). The distribution of dropout and turnover
rates among urban and suburban high schools. Sociology of Education, 73(1), 39-
67.
Ryan, R. M., Stiller, J., & Lynch, J. H. (1994). Representations of relationships to
teachers, parents, and friends as predictors of academic motivation and self-
esteem. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, 226–249
Sabornie, E.J. (1994). Social-affective characteristics of early adolescents identified as
learning disabled and nondisabled. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 17(4), 268-
79.
Smerdon, B.A. (1999). Engagement and Achievement: Differences between African-
American and White students. Research in Sociology of Education and
Socialization, 12, 103-134.
Smerdon, B.A. (2002). Students’ perceptions of membership in their high schools.
Sociological Education, 75(4), 287–305.
Solomon, D., Watson, M., Battistich, V., Schaps, E., & Delucchi, K. (1996). Creating
classrooms that student’s experience as communities. American Journal of
Community Psychology, 24 719-748.
48
Steinberg, L.D., Lamborn, S., Dornbusch, S. M., & Darling, N. (1992) Impact of
parenting practices on adolescent achievement: Authoritative parenting, school
involvement, and encouragement to succeed. Child Development, 63, 1266-1281.
Stevens, S.E., Steele, C.A., Jutai, J.W., Kalnins, I.V., Bortolussi, J.A., & Biggar, W.D.
(1996). Adolescents with physical disabilities: some psychosocial aspects of
health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 19, 157-164.
Trusty, J., & Dooley-Dickey, K. (1993). Alienation from school: An exploratory analysis
of elementary and middle school students’ perceptions. Journal of Research and
Development in Education, 26(4), 232 – 242
Virginia Department of Education. (n.d.) 2013 Class of 2013 State Level and District
Cohort Report. Retrieved April, 2014, from
https://p1pe.doe.virginia.gov/reportcard/report.do?division=52&schoolName=All
Warnock, M. (2005) Impact No.11 Special educational needs: a new look. Philosophy of
Education Society of Great Britain.
Wehlage, G. G., & Rutter; R. A. (1986). Dropping out: How much do schools contribute
to the problem? Teachers College Record, 87, 374-392.
Wigfield A. 1994. Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: a developmental
perspective. Educational. Psychology Review. 6:49–78
