This information is provided as a public service to highlight matters of current interest and does
not imply an attorney-client relationship. It is not intended to constitute a full review of any
subject matter, nor is it a substitute for obtaining specific legal advice from appropriate counsel.
Page 1 of 6
New York and New Jersey -
Key Differences in Marital Law
You Need To Know
A divorce formally dissolves a legal marriage. While married couples do not possess a
constitutional or legal right to divorce, states permit divorces because doing so serves public
policy. Every state has different rules about divorce. A valid and legal divorce can only be
granted if a party meets the state’s residency requirement for divorce. Whether you're looking
for answers to questions about how to divide property, how to create a parenting plan, or how
much child support or alimony you might get, you need to understand the domestic relations
laws of the state where you live.
Interestingly, and notwithstanding their status as neighbors, New York’s and New
Jersey’s divorce laws, statutes, and legal precedents often keep litigants questioning, whether it
is more advantageous to file for divorce in New York or New Jersey. Especially during the
COVID-19 pandemic and continuing to the present time we have fielded calls from potential
clients questioning whether commencing an action in New York or New Jersey would be more
advantageous.
One noticeable difference between New Jersey and New York is each state’s formula for
the calculation of child support. Both New York and New Jersey use the husband’s and the
NY/NJ METRO FAMILY LAW PRACTICE
INSIGHTS
June 2023
This information is provided as a public service to highlight matters of current interest and does
not imply an attorney-client relationship. It is not intended to constitute a full review of any
subject matter, nor is it a substitute for obtaining specific legal advice from appropriate counsel.
Page 2 of 6
wife’s incomes and the number of children born of the marriage as variables in the formula.
However, New Jersey, unlike New York, uses two additional variables: the number of overnights
the payee will spend with the children and the ages of the children. Moreover, New Jersey
uses the parties’ net incomes to calculate Basic Child Support. All local, state and federal
taxes are credited. New York support is calculated on approximate gross income, with a credit
only given for local NYC / Yonkers taxes (as well as FICA). The difference between using net
and gross dollars will also affect the calculation of each party’s proportional share of additional
child support expenses, commonly referred to as Add-On Expenses in New York and
Supplemental Child Support Expenses in New Jersey. While both states allocate these additional
child expenses based on pro rata share of income, using gross versus net income will lead to a
different pro rata share. The differing amounts could be significant, especially if the additional
expenses include private school and summer camp costs.
Another noticeable difference between New York and New Jersey is how the amount
and duration of spousal support are determined. New York uses the term “spousal
maintenance” when referring to spousal support. Under New York law, the amount and
duration of spousal maintenance are initially calculated using a mathematical formula referred
to as the “maintenance guidelines.” This formula considers the gross income of both parties as
well as the length of the marriage. For the purposes of this calculation, the payor of spousal
maintenance has their income capped at a statutory amount. The statutory cap is currently set
at $203,000. A court may deviate from the “maintenance guideline amount” based on
statutory factors, which include: the age and health of the parties, the parties’ present and
future earning capacity, and any other factor the court finds just and proper.
This information is provided as a public service to highlight matters of current interest and does
not imply an attorney-client relationship. It is not intended to constitute a full review of any
subject matter, nor is it a substitute for obtaining specific legal advice from appropriate counsel.
Page 3 of 6
New Jersey uses the term “alimony” when referring to spousal support. Unlike New
York, there is no initial mathematical formula for calculating alimony. Instead, the amount and
duration of alimony is set after the consideration of statutory factors, which include: the actual
need and ability of the parties to pay, the standard of living established in the marriage, and
any other factors which the court may deem relevant. New Jersey law also provides that for
any marriage less than 20 years in duration, the total length of alimony may not exceed the
length of the marriage, except in exceptional circumstances.
There are also some differences with respect to equitable distribution in both states.
Both states have equitable distribution, meaning a couple's assets and earnings accumulated
during the marriage will be divided equitably (fairly)—but not necessarily equally.
For example, when it comes to purchasing real property together, buyer beware! In
New York, even if you place a residence in joint name, and assuming you meet the burden of
proof, you generally have a continued claim for any separate property contributed to the
residence. In New Jersey, however, if you contribute separate property into a jointly titled
residence, you generally lose your separate property claim. Notwithstanding, you can make an
argument for a greater “equitable share” of the home because of the inequities created by your
contribution of separate property assets.
In New York with respect to deferred income as unvested options, restricted stock,
RSUs, and/or REUs, whether granted before or during the marriage, or even shortly after the
date of complaint, generally, courts will look at the time the options were granted / vest and
then apply a coverture fraction to determine equitable distributions. In its basic form, the
denominator of the coverture fraction is the total earning period, and the numerator is the
This information is provided as a public service to highlight matters of current interest and does
not imply an attorney-client relationship. It is not intended to constitute a full review of any
subject matter, nor is it a substitute for obtaining specific legal advice from appropriate counsel.
Page 4 of 6
married years while earning the options. In New Jersey the distribution of these types of assets
in some instances fall under more of an all or nothing test, meaning, the issue is whether stock
options obtained either after the divorce complaint was filed or not yet vested at the time of the
divorce were awarded for past performance or for future performance. If the titled party can
prove it is for future performance, then the argument could be made that no portion of the
options are to be considered marital and subject to equitable distribution.
One final example of the difference is with respect to business valuations and the
concept of “double dipping” into the same income stream. The idea behind “double dipping”
stems from the notion that some business valuation methodologies can create inequities when
addressing the issues of alimony / maintenance and child support i.e., double counting of the
business income and again with respect to income available for support. In New York, the case
law is clear that double dipping is not permitted, meaning once a court converts a specific
stream of income to an asset, that income may no longer be calculated into the support formula
and payout. Alternatively, in New Jersey, the New Jersey Supreme Court specifically rejected
the concept of “double-dipping” in the context of business valuation for divorce purposes. The
Court reasoned that albeit interrelated, the two concepts are separate, distinct, and not entirely
compatible financial exercises, and because asset valuation methodologies applied in the
equitable distribution setting are not congruent with the factors relevant to alimony
considerations.
An experienced and knowledgeable family law attorney can help navigate the difficult
issue of whether to commence an action in New York or New Jersey. If you need legal help for
this or any other family law issue, please contact the New York/New Jersey Metro law team at
This information is provided as a public service to highlight matters of current interest and does
not imply an attorney-client relationship. It is not intended to constitute a full review of any
subject matter, nor is it a substitute for obtaining specific legal advice from appropriate counsel.
Page 5 of 6
Phillips Nizer, LLP. We have offices in both New York and New Jersey and each partner in this
group is licensed to practice in both states.
This information is provided as a public service to highlight matters of current interest and does
not imply an attorney-client relationship. It is not intended to constitute a full review of any
subject matter, nor is it a substitute for obtaining specific legal advice from appropriate counsel.
Page 6 of 6
CONTACT US
Stephanie F. Lehman
Chair, NY/NJ Metro Family Law Practice
Louis Gerber
Partner, NY/NJ Metro Family Law Practice
Fara K. Rodriguez
Partner, NY/NJ Metro Family Law Practice
Locations
485 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10017
212.977.9700 Main Tel | 212.262.5152 Fax
433 Hackensack Avenue, Suite 803, Hackensack, NJ 07601
201.487.3700 Main Tel | 201.606.1764 Fax
www.phillipsnizer.com
A member of AllyLaw