authorities and often sub-contractors involved, with often quite disparate procedures regarding
carcass up-lifts and how these are recorded, makes this an area where, in England, much further
enquiries would need to be made to see if standardised records can be made available in future.
By contrast, in Scotland carcass uplifts by local roads departments (generally overseen there by
Regional Councils equivalent to English Counties rather than at district council level), formed one
of the most important and extensive sources of data available for that parallel study (Langbein &
Putman, 2006b). Similar co-ordination of data provision in England at county level on our behalf
has only been possible by for example, Hertfordshire, where all roads are maintained by
Hertfordshire Highways on behalf of the council.
ii) [IC] Insurance Companies / Motor Rescue
Input of information from all but one major insurance company has been very disappointing, with
most claims managers stating that they are unable readily to extract those claims relating to deer,
as computer logs at best tended to enable extraction of all „animal‟ related incidents; suggesting
that thereafter searches would require time-consuming (& thus costly) individual retrieval of paper
files if feasible at all. A regional claims manager for NFU Mutual did ask all his claims staff to try
and record any deer related incidents from beginning of the study, but very few data were received.
By sharp contrast, however, Fortis Group Insurance (with c. 4% of the UK private motor
insurance market) have proved an extremely useful source of well stratified DVC data across all of
Britain, with information on over 2200 deer related claims available to date from their policy holders
during 1999 – 2005 (average >300 per annum). These data although originating from just the one
Insurance Group (formerly consisting of several smaller companies) do provide a very wide sample
of incidents from throughout the UK, and show the very high potential for equally useful information
from other Insurers. Although recruitment of data from additional insurers remains a high priority for
the ongoing project, the 2000+ DVC claims already identified by Fortis are based on a very high
overall number of private-vehicle motor claims handled by Fortis overall (c. 110,000 – 130000
claims in each of the six years). As such they provide a good basis sample from which to estimate
minimum proportions of DVC related insurance claims nationwide which may be expected across
the Insurance sector.
Further input from Insurers was recently sought via discussions with the UK Claims
Managers Association, and it is hoped that at least some further companies may provide data on
DVC claims handled by them during the present extension of data collection for 2006 and 2007.
Motor Road-side Rescue Organisations and Car-Hire firms presented a further potential source of
information on DVC occurrence. However, discussions to date with the AA and RAC indicate their
record systems are unlikely to be able to capture data on DVCs, as incidents are generally logged
according to a wide range of differing „damage‟ types rather than the causes of the damage or
accident. Similar replies were obtained from a number o f national car-hire firms we appoached.
iii) [ D ] ‘Deer-Knowledgeable’ Contributors
Contributors with some degree of specialist knowledge of deer (including amongst others
professional wildlife/ deer managers, rangers, amateur stalkers, members of BDS, BASC, DCS;
Mammal Society, ecological consultants and researchers) were able to provide us with some of the
most detailed information. In many cases these contributors are persons called to the incident to
attend to injured live deer, and hence able to provide details on the species and sex of animal, and
at times information on other accident circumstances, accurate location details, and habitats.
Major Forests / Estates: Systems for detailed recording have been set-up with managers /
rangers from major forests with long standing problems with DVCs (including Forestry Commission
forests such as Cannock Chase, Thetford, New Forest, The Dean, and Wyre Forest; as well as
non-FC forests including Ashridge, Ashdown, Epping, Dinmore, and others). The nine above
named sites alone have submitted around 750 records per annum since 2003 (with records for
several of these sites also available for many earlier years). These DVC records are now
increasingly being maintained by all the sites to a comparatively high level of precision regarding
date, time and location (i.e. mostly to within 100 to 500 m), with usually also supplementary details
available on species / sex / fate of animal (i.e. whether requiring dispatch or killed outright etc.).
Although focussed on specific forest areas with often high deer densities, and thus not necessarily
representative of the situation in the wider countryside, these data are particularly useful to look
into, for example, species/sex differences in seasonality of accidents, affects of habitats, road