University of Nebraska - Lincoln University of Nebraska - Lincoln
DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln
National Collegiate Honors Council
Monographs: Chapters
National Collegiate Honors Council
2023
Honors Liberal Arts for the 21st Century Honors Liberal Arts for the 21st Century
John Carrell
Texas Tech University
Aliza S. Wong
Texas Tech University
Chad Cain
Texas Tech University
Carrie J. Preston
Boston University
Muhammad H. Zaman
Boston University
Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchcmonochap
Part of the Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Gifted Education Commons, Higher Education
Commons, Higher Education Administration Commons, and the Other Education Commons
Carrell, John; Wong, Aliza S.; Cain, Chad; Preston, Carrie J.; and Zaman, Muhammad H., "Honors Liberal
Arts for the 21st Century" (2023).
National Collegiate Honors Council Monographs: Chapters
. 129.
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchcmonochap/129
This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the National Collegiate Honors Council at
DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in National Collegiate
Honors Council Monographs: Chapters by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska
- Lincoln.
403
CHAPTER SIXTEEN
Honors Liberal Arts for the 21st Century
John Carrell
Texas Tech University
Aliza S. Wong
Texas Tech University
Chad Cain
Texas Tech University
Carrie J. Preston
Boston University
Muhammad H. Zaman
Boston University
introduction
H
onors colleges are rearticulating their mission and purpose
within the changing landscape of higher education in the
United States. Many honors colleges were originally designed to
oer students transformative undergraduate experiences similar to
Honors Colleges in the 21st Century | Richard Badenhausen, editor
Copyright 2023, National Collegiate Honors Council | Used by permission
404
C, W, C, P,  Z
those of a small liberal arts college but within the context of a larger
university. ey oen featured a Great Books-based curriculum
with a primarily Western canon of texts taught chronologically,
as well as a history of ideas that, once controversial and debated,
became part of “paradigm shis” (Kuhn). While this curriculum
aligned with traditional notions of the liberal arts, honors col
-
leges that historically oered a curriculum based on classical “great
books” and “big ideas” increasingly faced tensions between that
curriculum and the crucial concerns of inclusion, anti-colonialism,
anti-racism, equity, diversity, and social justice—all of critical inter
-
est to contemporary students. Many honors students and faculty in
such programs have asked why they should devote time to reading
the canon of “great books” when the standards of greatness were
developed by closed groups of Western intellectuals, whose power,
inuence, and wealth were oen built on the exploitation of others
through systems of colonialism and enslavement. Western canons
have been criticized for their racial, ethnic, and gendered biases, as
well as their elitism and failure to represent the diversity and com
-
plexity of contemporary U.S. college students. As universities and
colleges have increasingly brought global challenges into under
-
graduate classrooms, many honors colleges have asked how they
can modernize the liberal arts for the twenty-rst century.
We argue that honors colleges can deploy the power of the
liberal arts to emphasize diversity, equity, global citizenship, and
empowerment by combining liberal arts and STEM elds in inter
-
disciplinary approaches to global challenges, such as climate change,
the pandemic, and forced displacement. We advocate for the goal
of inspiring the next generation of ethically engaged global leaders,
scholars, and practitioners. Traditionally, the liberal arts included
arithmetic, astronomy, geometry, grammar, logic, music, and rhet
-
oric, but today the liberal arts have evolved to include such elds
as art, science, history, languages, and literature, to name a few. A
liberal arts education embraces the breadth and depth of human
existence. In a society increasingly motivated by material culture,
the liberal arts allow for an expansiveness of thinking, an explora
-
tion of human creativity, and an emphasis on understanding and
405
L A
bettering the human condition. Beyond pragmatism and applica-
tion, a liberal arts education allows for the unfettered contemplation
of human possibility. (See the Forum on Honors Beyond the Lib
-
eral Arts.)
is chapter builds on our experiences of retaining a com
-
mitment to the liberal arts and humanities while developing
interdisciplinary majors, courses, and programs emphasizing
STEM training and featuring partnerships across the liberal arts
and professional schools. At two very dierent institutions—a
Research 1, Division 1 public university, Texas Tech University
(TTU), and a large private urban research university, Boston Uni
-
versity (BU)—we shied the honors curriculum away from a focus
on great books/great ideas to one on interdisciplinary approaches
to grand challenges. While preserving the free inquiry characteris
-
tic of the liberal arts and resisting cuts to the humanities, the new
curriculum brings these values to the most contemporary issues
and approaches, thus positioning students to center humanistic
and ethical perspectives, regardless of their future professions.
background
When TTU founded its honors college twenty-one years ago,
transforming the small program housed in the College of Arts and
Sciences into a full-edged college, TTU students, faculty, and
sta were invited to create a small liberal arts-like college within
a large research university. In these twenty-one years, the TTU
Honors College has developed a mission “to provide an enriched
learning experience for intellectually capable and curious under
-
graduate students” and “serve as a catalyst for innovative growth
and change at the University” (Texas Tech). Working closely with
all TTU colleges and schools, the honors college invites the most
talented, generous, innovative scholar-teachers to sustain an envi
-
ronment in which academically ambitious students have access to
the resources of a major research university. ey engage in intense,
intellectually rigorous conversations in small seminar-style classes.
e honors colleges enriched curriculum hones students’ critical
thinking and multi-modal communication skills and exposes them
406
C, W, C, P,  Z
to extraordinary educational experiences such as a senior thesis,
study abroad, community service and engagement, and intern
-
ships. TTU honors courses dig deeper into a topic, introduce and
seek solutions to the grand challenges facing society today, and
question the validity of orthodox truisms.
Preparation of honors students at TTU is based on the inte
-
gration of a liberal arts education within the students major. Like
many students in other honors colleges, TTU honors students may
major in any area the institution oers. e TTU Honors College
remains one of the few honors colleges, however, that hosts its own
major, Honors Science and the Humanities (HSH).
Boston University’s Arvind and Chandan Nandlal Kilachand
Honors College, founded in 2010 and renamed in 2011 aer a record
$25 million gi from trustee Rajen Kilachand, was designed to oer
a four-year undergraduate program and living-learning community
to BU’s highest-performing incoming rst-year students. Students
enroll in one of BUs degree-granting undergraduate schools and
colleges and take approximately a quarter of their credits through
the Kilachand Honors College. e initial goal of the college was to
provide the small classes, personal attention, close interaction with
faculty, and communal atmosphere of a small liberal arts college,
together with the intellectual range and resources of a major urban
research university. e curriculum emphasized great books and
big ideas, interdisciplinary exploration, and the ethical dilemmas
of history. e value of this version of the liberal arts was dicult
to articulate, particularly to students enrolled in BU’s professional
schools, including engineering, business, education, and pre-med;
moreover, retention of these students was a challenge.
Despite their commitment to oering small classes and addi
-
tional resources to high-achieving students, the honors colleges at
TTU and BU have each faced the challenge of convincing a new
generation of parents and students of the malleability, utility, and
foundational importance of the liberal arts and humanities as the
number of science and engineering majors continues to increase.
To meet this challenge, we reconceptualized and rebranded lib
-
eral arts education for the twenty-rst century while maintaining
407
L A
a strong emphasis on the humanities and critical inquiry, a shi
we believe provides a model for other honors colleges. Although
the histories and missions of TTU and BU are dierent, a similar
approach to modernizing the liberal arts was applied successfully at
both honors colleges.
implementations:
texas tech university honors science and humanities
In the past ten years, as discourse about economic recessions,
employment challenges, and other structural disruptions per
-
meates the media, more students understand college as focused
professional training rather than an opportunity for intellectual
exploration. Even in honors colleges, where the principles of cre
-
ative and critical thinking are a prominent focus, students are
burdened with major requirements that are becoming increasingly
specic, skills oriented, and narrow in perspective.
By the fall of 2018, the number of students in TTU Honors Col
-
leges previous liberal arts major—Honors Arts and Letters—had
become critically low, causing the TTU Honors College to rethink
how to commit students to creative and critical thinking in the lib
-
eral arts. Evaluation of major choices helped in determining the
direction and focus of what this revamped liberal arts major should
be in light of the fact that TTU Honors College students may choose
to declare a major oered by any of the colleges at Texas Tech. In
fact, most students have declared a STEM eld major within either
the TTU College of Arts & Sciences or the Whitacre College of
Engineering. e Honors Science and Humanities (HSH) major
was created to modernize the liberal arts curriculum, bringing the
ancient Greek trivium and quadrivium into the twenty-rst cen
-
tury while focusing on the development of STEM elds and talents.
HSH majors can choose from four concentrations, all of which cen
-
ter the vocabulary of the humanities as the driving factor in human
discovery and action:
• Medicine, Global Health, and the Humanities. is concen
-
tration encourages pre-health honors students to broaden
408
C, W, C, P,  Z
their educational experiences in order to become more
competitive applicants to professional healthcare programs
and more well-rounded professionals. rough a profound
exploration of the intersections between health, healing, and
the humanities, graduates will be able to better communi
-
cate the compassion, creativity, and innovation of scientic
thinking in humanistic terms.
• Environment and the Humanities. With its foundation in the
sciences, this concentration focuses on the study of the human
relationship to the environment. Courses draw upon science,
engineering, philosophy, literature, and the arts. Honors stu
-
dents delve profoundly into environmental sciences through
the historic relationship between human beings and their
surroundings.
• Politics, Philosophy, Economics, and the Law. is concen
-
tration is designed to oer students the opportunity to gain
a solid sense of the human-constructed world, where it
came from, and where it may be going. e track explores
the world’s greatest intellectual and cultural achievements,
as well as the struggles and tensions that are always part of
politics, power, and privilege. Honors students will hone
their skills in writing, multi-modal communication, schol
-
arly research, and critical analysis, better preparing them for
graduate school and/or a broad range of careers in law, busi
-
ness, communication, education, and advocacy.
• Humanities-Driven STEM (HDSTEM). e HDSTEM focus
is now being developed with the generous support of an
NEH Connections Planning Grant. is concentration
oers honors students interested in engineering, architec
-
ture, structural design, urban planning, natural resources,
and life cycle analysis the opportunity to contextualize con
-
struction, manufacturing, and industrial practices within
a discourse on human and natural environments. Students
engage with complex questions in the areas of sustainabil
-
ity, marketing, and fabrication even as they connect to the
409
L A
historic and social impacts of scientic, industrial, and tech-
nological revolutions.
Each concentration is made up of a selection of ve courses devel
-
oped in collaboration with the other colleges, the Museum of
Texas Tech, the School of Law, the TTU Health Sciences Center
(TTUHSC), the STEM CORE, and Mexican American and Latinx
Studies. e TTU Honors College works in collaboration with
the Creative Process Commons and the Humanities Center to
create curricular and co-curricular oerings that foreground the
humanities pedagogically and methodologically in each of these
concentrations. Moreover, interdisciplinary collaboration through
team teaching is strongly encouraged for all programs within the
HSH major. is interdisciplinary focus allows students to see the
interaction between elds rsthand and learn the challenges and
triumphs of an interconnected world.
beyond honors science and the humanities
HSH is the hallmark of TTU’s honors liberal arts education.
e dened coursework and tracks give students control of their
education as they confront the rigor of critical thinking and inno
-
vative ideation. While some honors students may choose a dierent
major than HSH, HSH courses are available to all honors students.
Further, the many programs the TTU Honors College provides for
students are guided by the same principles of HSH and a liberal
arts education. In their exit surveys, graduating seniors note the
following as evidence of our teaching excellence and commitment
to student academic success:
• Undergraduate Research Scholars (URS) Program is the
largest undergraduate research program at the university; it
pairs students committed to research with faculty mentors
(including those at the School of Law and TTUHSC); sup
-
ports undergraduate travel and registration fees to present at
professional research conferences as well as publications and
honors college theses; and results in work in graduate labs,
archives, and libraries;
410
C, W, C, P,  Z
• Honors seminars dare students to think creatively, innova-
tively, and beyond the four walls of a classroom with such
oerings as Sustaining the Global Ecology and Economy in
the 21st Century; Exploring Human Interaction rough
Video Games; Introduction to Scientic Illustration: Bones,
Birds, and Botanicals; Epidemiology of Infectious and
Chronic Diseases; and Icons of Popular Culture: Mystery
Science eater 3000;
• Honors Summit courses bring theory and praxis together in
experiential ways with such oerings as Global Grand Chal
-
lenges: Past, Present, and Future; Hamlet, Unlimited; Science
Fiction and Science; Principles of Public Health; and Making
a Sustainable Future: Environmental, Economic, and Social
Impacts of Sustainability;
• First-Year Experience (FYE)/Learning Community Group
(LCG) Program oers core curriculum taught by some of the
best teachers/scholars at TTU to help the transition of rst-
year students to university life. Special Topics Workshops
in LCGs encourage rst-year students to become familiar
with the vocabulary of the timeliest issues (mental health,
substance abuse, race and ethnicity, gender and sexuality,
rape culture and campus safety, and microaggressions) and
understand best practices in engaging in civil dialogues;
• TTU Honors HDSTEM Film Series—a collaboration with
Alamo Drahouse that invites the honors community, the
wider TTU campus, and members of the city of Lubbock
to view lms and then hear from two speakers, a humanist
and a scientist, as they discuss the intersections of the arts,
humanities, and STEM in popular culture;
• TTU Honors special guest lectures—with a particular focus
on diversity, equity, and inclusion, and with the support
of other entities on the TTU campus, honors students are
invited to have one-on-one discussions with some of the
most important thinkers, writers, and innovators of the age,
411
L A
followed by a larger public lecture. Guests have included
Julio Ricardo Varela, Harriet Washington, Katharine Hay
-
hoe, and many more.
Ultimately, the honors college asks our students not just what
they want to be when their academic career ends, but who they
want to be and what it means to be human. And we ask the funda
-
mental question of what it means to grow and learn. TTU Honors
College students rise to the challenge and seek solutions to our
grand challenges through research, creative activity, writing, team
-
work, and innovation. Our in-house faculty, aliated faculty, and
sta are committed to undergraduate education and work to cre
-
ate the space and ambience that allows for inquiry, invention, and
application. With creative approaches to pedagogy, interdisciplin
-
ary classes, team teaching, and non-traditional coursework, our
students, faculty, and sta make every experience one in which we
can grow and excel together.
implementations:
boston universitys interdisciplinary perspectives
on global challenges
Faced with many of the same challenges as the TTU Honors
College, the BU Kilachand Honors College rearticulated its mission
to provide a liberal arts education and small living-learning com
-
munity with a focus on three interconnected pillars: Community,
Knowledge, and Humanity.
Community
rough co-curricular and social events, personal and pro-
fessional development opportunities, peer mentoring, and
empowerment spaces, we invite students to participate fully in our
diverse community. Each course also develops its own community,
fostered by a common pursuit of knowledge.
412
C, W, C, P,  Z
Knowledge
Kilachand Honors College oers a challenging liberal education
grounded in exploration, discovery, creativity, and the real-world
applications of knowledge. We rearticulated the goal of a liberal arts
education as one that nurtures the capacity to engage armatively
and skillfully with diverse social, cultural, scientic, and philosoph
-
ical discourses and perspectives. We emphasize a free exchange and
expression of ideas, constructive debate that respects intellectual
and cultural diversity, and the principle of pluralism as a source
of strength and insight. We apply perspectives from the sciences,
arts, humanities, and professional schools to understand the shared
conditions of our humanity.
Humanity
Kilachand students consider important global, social, corpo-
rate, and geopolitical challenges both inside the classroom and
outside in our experiential learning program, which oers students
opportunities to learn by doing and reecting on the experience
of doing. Our students imagine and execute a substantial work of
empirical or scholarly research, creativity, or invention that we call
the Keystone Project. e Kilachand Internship Program supports
students participating in unpaid social justice internships. rough
our collaboration with Boston Medical Center’s diversity initiative,
our students may teach and mentor Boston Public High School
students interested in health careers through a unique pipeline
program. Finally, Kilachand students can participate in short-term
study abroad programs in challenging environments through our
Initiative on Forced Displacement.
example:
boston universitys focus on forced displacement
Kilachand Honors Colleges multi-pronged work on the global
challenge of forced displacement is perhaps the clearest example of
our approach to modernizing the liberal arts for twenty-rst-century
413
L A
learners. Our program responds to a series of crises that have led
the United Nations’ refugee agency (UNHCR) to identify over 100
million people of concern in May 2022. e challenge of forced dis
-
placement is rooted in myriad factors, ranging from conict and
colonialism to corruption and climate change. Refugees and inter
-
nally displaced communities are without nancial and political
agency and regularly languish in camps for decades. We developed
three interrelated tiers to address this situation:
1. Interdisciplinary honors coursework;
2. Experiential learning in complex environments; and
3. Co-curricular discussions, events, and project support. Each
tier is fully interdisciplinary and seeks to bridge classroom-
based learning and practical experiences.
We established an honors course that is team-taught by faculty
hailing from international relations, engineering, the humanities,
anthropology, and law. A central argument of the class is that the
insights and methods of every discipline are needed to under
-
stand forced displacement and propose ethical solutions. e class
balances the goals of studying the massive scale of the problem
with lectures on, for example, the history and legal framework of
the UNHCR with a focus on a particular displacement context.
Another topic was the Afghan refugee crisis; it had, even before the
end of the U.S. occupation in August 2021, produced more than
two million refugees, with many more eeing Taliban rule. Human
displacement is an aspect of human mobility and involves all facets
of what it means to be human, including, but not limited to, gender
and sexuality, health and well-being, race and ethnicity, religion,
creativity, technology, and urban cultures. Displacement is not a
phenomenon limited to a particular group or a specic region: it is
a human condition to which we are all potentially, albeit dierently,
vulnerable. Rejecting the narrative that refugees contribute little
of cultural value or are helpless victims in need of aid, we invite
students to reect on the resilience and ingenuity of refugee com
-
munities as well as their art, literature, and culture.
414
C, W, C, P,  Z
Connected to the interdisciplinary course on forced displace-
ment, we have established an experiential learning program with
partners at the American University of Beirut (Lebanon); Maker
-
ere University in Kampala (Uganda); Universidad de los Andes in
Bogotá (Colombia); and two Texas-based NGOs, Refugee Services
of Texas and Rio Valley Relief Project. Our students and faculty in
the program study the refugee crisis for two to three weeks alongside
their counterparts at partner universities and participate in estab
-
lished eorts to respond to forced displacement. e courses open
with discussions of the context, demographics, and history of dis
-
placed populations and how any particular group (Syrian refugees
in Lebanon or South American asylum seekers at the Mexico-U.S.
border) t into the international refugee paradigm. We discuss the
emotional and physical health challenges faced by refugees and
the all-important concerns of respect, sensitivity, cultural under
-
standing, and ethical conduct of research in humanitarian crises.
We work directly with local NGOs, government institutions, and
policymakers, as well as domain experts, and we ultimately ask our
students to identify opportunities to improve the health and well-
being of displaced populations.
As in the semester-long honors course, students in our short-
term, immersive programs benet from watching faculty with
dierent disciplinary expertise and personal perspectives work
together and even disagree with each other: a scholar of gender
might critique the biases of international refugee policies and dis
-
cuss gender-based violence, including child marriage in refugee
communities. An anthropologist points to the West-centric cultural
assumptions underlying many eorts to stop child marriage and
how some feminist projects fail to consider religion and cultural
beliefs. Some engineers celebrate the impact of humanitarian engi
-
neering interventions while others point to the technophilia and
ethical complexity of many projects. Students in interdisciplinary
teams can help each other recognize blind spots, cultural biases, or
an inability to communicate a design idea to diverse stakeholders.
Fieldwork and direct engagement with displaced people and
humanitarian workers are crucial aspects of the program, as are
415
L A
conversations about the ethical dangers of voluntourism or disas-
ter-tourism. Students and faculty alike must face the complexity of
establishing courses, conducting research, and developing projects
in a humanitarian crisis. Our students want to help and feel like
they are good citizens of the world. At the same time, we must admit
that students and faculty are benetting more from the program
than are the refugees, aid workers, and asylum seekers. Faculty
might publish studies, design a new technology, develop teaching
and research expertise, or otherwise advance their careers. Students
add unique skills and experiences to their résumés. We all secure
a story to discuss at interviews, professional meetings, and social
engagements. We must acknowledge that our motivations include
ambition and fascination as well as a desire to help.
Knowing that neither a short-term experiential program nor an
entire semester is enough to address forced displacement, we pro
-
vide spaces for students to process their experiences and develop
projects further in the third and nal tier, our co-curricular
program. We oer opportunities for students to engage with practi
-
tioners, writers, and scholars; watch and discuss lms and plays; or
visit exhibitions. We also provide structured support for students to
develop projects or research they began in courses and short-term
intensive programs. Students who participate in the co-curricular
programs do not earn course credit, but they do fulll general
education requirements. We recognize that the three tiers of the
initiative cannot do justice to the challenge of forced displacement,
but we oer multiple opportunities for students to engage with the
problem and hope that they will pursue other disciplinary tracks
and courses to further their education in this area.
texas tech university impacts
e approach of blending elds and reinvigorating the liberal
arts is also working at TTU: HSH course enrollments and major
declarations have both increased. Such innovation is a common
theme in many honors-related publications: essays on interdisci
-
plinarity, trandisciplinarity, multidisciplinarity, and integrative
learning are well represented in both Honors in Practice and the
416
C, W, C, P,  Z
Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council. ese peda-
gogical and education research eorts in the honors education
eld have been helpful in guiding the TTU Honors College in the
development of the HSH major and investigating the eectiveness
of the new liberal arts approach. rough this investigation, the
TTU Honors College has been successful in receiving grants from
the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH). ese grants
have helped grow and promote the HSH major and HDSTEM
curriculum via research on interdisciplinarity, especially the rela
-
tionship between the humanities and STEM and the manner in
which STEM students can benet from exposure to creativity and
innovation (Bequette and Bequette; Henriksen). While the human
-
ities have traditionally played little or no role in STEM education
(Wisnioski), natural connections exist between the humanities and
STEM that deepen students’ educational experiences (Hudson et
al.). For example, new technologies designed and manufactured
by scientists and engineers have an impact on how we communi
-
cate within and across societies (Ertas). e HSH degree program
explicitly makes these connections and links humanities to STEM
through the interdisciplinary background of faculty.
HDSTEM expands upon current interdisciplinary approaches
by introducing STEM problem-solving skills and methods within
a humanities framework, which in turn may help students develop
empathy. When students are provided a context of where and why
problems arise and are asked to use typical STEM problem-solving
approaches, they are encouraged to empathize with those impacted
by the problem and to explore the larger needs of society, the
motivations of actors, and quality of life considerations. Further,
students have more to say about a situation when they are asked
to problem solve and empathize with a given topic (Carrell et al.,
“Using Humanities”; Carrell et al., “Humanities-Driven STEM”).
Students change their perspectives in these interdisciplin
-
ary settings, particularly when problem-solving. For example, in
HDSTEM courses, students move from a very technical and hard
science approach in problem-solving to a more well-rounded
approach when they attend more to the social, political, and ethical
implications of their decision-making. is type of problem-solving
417
L A
is helpful for all honors students, especially those in STEM. As Wal-
ther et al. note, in line with guidelines put forth by the Accreditation
Board for Engineering and Technology (“Criteria”), engineering
students should learn skills that promote teamwork, eective com
-
munication, and reection on the role that engineering plays in
society—each of these skills requires an empathetic disposition.
Many STEM programs focus only on developing scientic, mathe
-
matical, and engineering content knowledge, divorcing these topics
from the emotional and social contexts in which they are situated
(Hoople and Choi-Fitzpatrick; McCurdy et al.).
boston university assessment, challenges,
and further work
Kilachand Honors Colleges approach to liberal arts education
and our program on forced displacement have been successful when
measured by student and faculty satisfaction. We have seen marked
improvements in student retention, one metric for student satisfac
-
tion that is a challenge for some honors colleges. First-year student
retention in Kilachand Honors College has increased from a low of
65% in the prior curriculum and remained above 90% for all four
cohorts matriculating under the current program, an increase of
38%. Four-year graduation rates per class year have reached and
exceeded 60% for the rst time in the history of the college (from a
low of 38% for the class of 2017), an increase of 71%.
We have certainly faced dicult moments in the classroom and
experiential learning program, but these challenges have regularly
reinforced the depth of learning taking place. Students have asked
crucial questions: Do we have the right to discuss and/or represent
refugees when we have not experienced displacement ourselves?
Can we avoid patronizing narratives and white saviorism? How do
we ask our students and ourselves to persevere in the face of the
inability of academia to solve the problems we discuss? Ultimately,
these questions demand that we face our own inadequacy, culpabil
-
ity, and privilege in relation to forced displacement with humility
and compassion.
418
C, W, C, P,  Z
Our program will never solve the problem of displacement, but
one of our future goals is to nd ways to support the further devel
-
opment and possible implementation of student projects, many
of which have been excellent. Several of our students and faculty
members have published research articles, essays, and op-eds. A
team of four Kilachand honors students (all pursuing liberal arts
majors) and an engineering student from the American University
of Beirut won the concluding pitch competition in Lebanon in 2018
with their prototype for an educational platform they designed to
prepare Syrian refugee children for Lebanese schools. e team
continued to work on their design and took rst place in BU’s Hult
Prize competition in the fall of 2018, then moved on to the regional
competition. Still, our program cannot boast that any of our stu
-
dents have implemented their work.
Although most of the assignments from university profes
-
sors, including BUs, do not result in implementation (nor are they
designed for this purpose), we feel a responsibility to the displaced
people and aid workers who speak with our students and give them
their valuable time and energy. If we are not contributing solutions,
how is the program avoiding voluntourism, or worse, disaster tour
-
ism? We engage this question with students, without pretending
that we have an easy answer. We are bolstered by the student reec
-
tions on experiences, including their thoughts on the potential
pitfalls of the program:
My time in Uganda was one of the most challenging and
eye-opening experiences that I have ever had. . . . Aer the
rst week of our trip to Uganda, I was ready to go home. I
was extremely critical of the program, other students, and
struggling with culture shock. However, by the last week, I
found myself surrounded by so many new, life-long friends
in a beautiful country and not ready to go home. I have
learned to be more exible, optimistic, and open-minded
on this journey in ways that I never planned to become.
—Education Student
419
L A
I learned so much more about how the world works, and I
also learned so much more about myself. Travelling and liv
-
ing in a country completely dierent from the United States
or even anywhere else I’ve visited exposed me to so many
new, dierent perspectives on how to view the world . . .
over the course of the trip, I rediscovered myself. I regained
my condence in my abilities to lead and work in teams.
—College of Arts and Sciences Student
e course aorded me a brief glimpse into the vivid com
-
plexities of life as a refugee which only helped reinforce
my beliefs in the responsibilities of the privileged towards
those who are not so. What was most unexpected was that
despite the seemingly endless nature of the war back home
and the grave hardships the refugees face day to day, not
one of the people we met saw a future not based in their
homeland. Such determination and hope was a stark and
refreshing counter to prevalent narratives about refugees
being aimless and uncertain in the determination of their
future.
—Engineering Student
Many comments in the student evaluations reveal that the program
changes lives. Yet, as with any university course, the long-term
impact on students is dicult to measure. Since 2018, several have
taken professional positions relevant to forced displacement, stud
-
ied international law, or pursued other relevant graduate degrees.
We are challenged to make sure our program is feasible and
sustainable into the future. Interdisciplinary team teaching is cen
-
tral to the BU Honors College, but it is also resource-intensive. We
depend on the chairs and deans of other colleges to release faculty
to teach in the honors college, which does not have faculty lines.
Currently, the core faculty who teach and travel for our co-curric
-
ular and short-term intensive programs do so at their own expense
or use research funds. We are committed to making the course
accessible to all students, regardless of personal resources, so we
must raise funds to support their participation as well. We have
been honored by the support of donors and charitable foundations,
420
C, W, C, P,  Z
and deans of other schools and colleges have provided funding for
their students to participate. us, we can demonstrate the larger
contributions of honors education and programming to the entire
university and fulll another valuable mission of honors colleges,
that is, to serve as incubators for innovative pedagogies and pro
-
grams focused on interdisciplinary approaches to major global and
ethical challenges. e incubation for our work on forced displace
-
ment took place within the honors college, but we are extending it
to benet the entire university.
conclusions
e “Census of U.S. Honors Colleges” included in this volume
reveals that only 10.8% of honors colleges at all institutions sur
-
veyed consider their pedagogical orientation to be a “Great Books
curriculum in 2021—a curriculum that is oen mistakenly col
-
lapsed into understandings of the liberal arts. e new approach,
for 87.9% of honors colleges, emphasizes “Interdisciplinary/cross-
disciplinary” pedagogies, but only 24.8% highlight “Global studies
(Cognard-Black and Smith 62). e survey did not ask honors col
-
leges to comment specically on a “liberal arts framework,” but at
TTU and BU, we have brought the best features of the liberal arts
approach, including its interdisciplinarity and ability to critique the
foundations of the so-called “Great Books,” to global challenges and
STEM education. We believe this approach is crucial to the eort to
recruit and retain diverse students who pursue STEM and profes
-
sional degrees with the highest ethical standards, especially given
the troubling low number of underrepresented minority students
in honors colleges and the lack of diversity of the leaders of honors
colleges, topics taken up in other chapters in this volume (Dinan et
al.; Pereira et al.).
Our honors colleges have redened the liberal arts and sciences
for the twenty-rst century by bringing the best interdisciplinary
approaches to global challenges and grand problems. Our programs
have focused on the human dimension of all disciplines, ensuring
courses benet from the skill of humanists at broaching di
-
cult conversations and ethical challenges. Exciting developments
421
L A
include team teaching and collaborations that, for example, bring
the design thinking that is a crucial skill in STEM to humanities
and social science projects. Honors curricula at our colleges have
served as incubators for innovative courses and pedagogies in
other programs. ey have advanced arguments for more inclusive
undergraduate communities, and our honors colleges have used
their exciting curricula to recruit diverse and historically under
-
represented students and faculty into honors while also equipping
those students with the crucial skills of being able to analyze some
of the world’s most pressing problems.
works cited
Bequette, James W., and Marjorie Bullitt Bequette. “A Place for Art
and Design Education in the STEM Conversation.Art Educa
-
tion, vol. 65, no. 2, 2012, pp. 40–47.
Carrell, John, et al. “Humanities-Driven STEM—Using History as
a Foundation for STEM Education in Honors.Honors in Prac
-
tice, vol. 16, 2020, pp. 53–69.
Carrell, John, et al. “Using Humanities as Context for STEM Empa
-
thy Development: A Discourse Analysis.” Atlanta: American
Society for Engineering Education-ASEE, 2020.
Cognard-Black, Andrew J., and Patricia J. Smith. “Characteristics
of the 21st-Century Honors College. Honors Colleges in the
21st Century, edited by Richard Badenhausen, National Col
-
legiate Honors Council, 2023, pp. 23–79.
Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs.” Accreditation
Board for Engineering and Technology, 2018.
Dinan, Susan, et al. “Positioning Honors Colleges to Lead Diver
-
sity and Inclusion Eorts at Predominantly White Institutions.
Honors Colleges in the 21st Century, edited by Richard Baden
-
hausen, National Collegiate Honors Council, 2023, pp. 277–300.
Ertas, Atila, editor. Transdisciplinarity: Bridging Natural Science,
Social Science, Humanities, & Engineering. eATLAS, 2011.
422
C, W, C, P,  Z
Forum on Honors Beyond the Liberal Arts. Journal of the National
Collegiate Honors Council. v. 23, no. 2, pp. 1–64.
Henriksen, Danah. “Full STEAM Ahead: Creativity in Excellent
STEM Teaching Practices.e STEAM Journal, vol. 1, no. 2,
2014, <https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?
article=1038&context=steam>.
Hoople, Gordon, D., and Austin Choi-Fitzpatrick. “Engineering
Empathy: A Multidisciplinary Approach Combining Engineer
-
ing, Peace Studies, and Drones.” Atlanta: American Society for
Engineering Education-ASEE, 2017.
Hudson, Peter B., et al. “Curricula Integration: Identifying and
Locating Engineering Education across the Australian Curric
-
ulum.Curriculum Perspectives, vol. 34, no. 1, 2014, pp. 43–50.
Kuhn, omas S. “Historical Structure of Scientic Discovery.Sci
-
ence, vol. 136, no. 3518, 1962, pp. 760–64.
McCurdy, Regina P., et al. “Problem-Based Design inking Tasks:
Engaging Student Empathy in STEM.Electronic Journal for
Research in Science & Mathematics Education, vol. 24, no. 2,
2020, pp. 22–55.
Pereira, Malin, et al. “From the Top Down: Implications of Honors
College Deans’ Race and Gender.Honors Colleges in the 21st
Century, edited by Richard Badenhausen, National Collegiate
Honors Council, 2023, pp. 181–210.
Texas Tech University Honors College. “TTU Honors Vision and
Mission, <https://www.depts.ttu.edu/honors/about/documents/
HonorsVisionandMissionJanuary2017.pdf>.
Walther, Joachim, et al. “Empathy and Engineering Formation.
Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 109, no. 1, 2020, pp. 11–33,
<https://doi:10.1002/jee.20301>.
Wisnioski, Matthew. “Whats the Use? History and Engineering
Education Research.Journal of Engineering Education, vol.
104, no. 3, 2015, pp. 244–51.