The effects of technology on interpersonal relationships among Rowan University students ages 18

Rowan University Rowan University

Rowan Digital Works Rowan Digital Works

Theses and Dissertations

8-15-2012

The effects of technology on interpersonal relationships among The effects of technology on interpersonal relationships among

Rowan University students ages 18 - 25 Rowan University students ages 18 - 25

Michelle Nelson

Follow this and additional works at: https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd

Part of the Public Relations and Advertising Commons

Recommended Citation Recommended Citation

Nelson, Michelle, "The effects of technology on interpersonal relationships among Rowan University

students ages 18 - 25" (2012).

Theses and Dissertations

. 156.

https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd/156

This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Rowan Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion

in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Rowan Digital Works. For more information, please

contact graduateresearch@rowan.edu.

THE EFFECTS OF TECHNOLOGY ON INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS

AMONG ROWAN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS AGES 18 – 25

Michelle Ann Nelson

A Thesis

Submitted to the

Department of Advertising and Public Relations

College of Communication

In partial fulfillment of the requirement

For the degree of

Master of the Arts in Public Relations

Rowan University

May 1, 2012

Thesis Chair: Dr. Joseph Basso

Dedication

I would like to dedicate this thesis to my parents, Charles J. Nelson and Jill A. Nelson,

and also to my siblings, Christopher J. Nelson and Nicole A. Nelson.

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank and acknowledge…

Dr. Joseph Basso for guiding me with continuous and valued feedback.

Fellow classmates for their support and flexibility with my study.

My co-workers for allowing me to have a flexible work schedule.

My family and friends.

Abstract

Michelle Ann Nelson

THE EFFECTS OF TECHNOLOGY ON INTERPERSONAL

RELATIONSHIPS AMONG ROWAN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS AGES 18 – 25

2012

Dr. Joseph Basso

Master of Arts in Public Relations

The purposes of this study were to (a) determine how young adults are

communicating with each other and (b) understand what is driving them to communicate

using different methods of communication. After completing a literature review, the

researcher conducted primary research using survey instruments and interviews.

What people are trying to communicate determines how they are going to relay

messages. The urgency of a message affects how respondents answer the message.

Table of Contents

Abstract iv

List of Figures vii

List of Tables viii

Chapter 1: Introduction 1

1.1 Statement of Problem 3

1.2 Purpose 4

1.3 Hypotheses and Research Questions 4

1.4 Procedure 5

1.5 Assumptions 6

1.6 Delimitations 6

1.7 Significance of Study 6

1.8 Definition of Terms 7

Chapter 2: Literature Review 8

2.1 Communication 8

2.2 Communication Motives 15

2.3 Communication Channel Selection 17

2.4 Technology, Social Media, and Web 2.0 21

2.5 Language and Meaning 26

2.6 The Importance of Face-to-Face Communication 29

Chapter 3: Methodology 32

3.1 Research Design 32

3.2 Source of Data 33

vii

3.3 Method of Acquiring Data 34

3.4 Method of Analyzing Data 35

3.5 Summary 35

Chapter 4: Findings 37

4.1 Methodology Review 37

4.2 Data Results 38

4.3 Survey Results 38

4.4 Personal Interview Results 44

Chapter 5: Conclusions and Recommendations 66

5.1 Hypothesis Statements 66

5.2 Study Successes and Failures 67

5.3 Main Findings 67

5.4 Strengths and Weaknesses 68

5.5 Meanings of Conclusions 68

5.6 Suggestions for Further Research 69

References 70

viii

List of Figures

Figure Page

Figure 1 Shannon/Weaver Model 21

Figure 2 Triangle of Meaning 31

List of Tables

Table Page

Table 1 27

Table 2 41

Table 3 43

Table 4 44

Table 5 45

Table 6 47

Table 7 48

Table 8 49

Table 9 50

Table 10 52

Table 11 53

Table 12 54

Table 13 56

Table 14 58

Table 15 59

Table 16 60

Table 17 61

Table 18 62

Table 19 64

Table 20 66

CHAPTER 1

Introduction

“Communication can be defined as the exchange, interchange, or transmission of

messages. Communication can occur for many purposes. Most communication

occurs because the content of the communication – the message – is intended

either to inform or to entertain, or sometimes both. The message is the content of

communication. That message is carried over some conduit – the medium – of

communication (Noll, 2007, p. 2).”

The author addressed both verbal and written communication in this study, both

of which have drastically changed the past few years in terms of how and when

communication takes place. The author focused on communication between Rowan

University students between the age of 18 and 25 to determine the impact that technology

has on their interpersonal relationships.

The first written communication were painted and carved figures in rock by

cavemen. Many years later, people introduced writing with letters. Telegraphs were

used to transmit signals in Morse code which was then received and written down by an

interpreter. This was the first use of written communication without paper. Today’s

symbols, letters of the alphabet, are used in written communication from handwritten

letters to technology oriented communication such as E-mail and instant messages.

Verbal communication has also changed drastically. Years after telegraph

transmissions evolved, voices were transmitted and the invention of the telephone was

introduced to the world. The telephone has changed drastically since the introduction of

the first phone. New technology such as Skype allows users to communicate via the

internet using verbal communication and webcam technology.

Technology has changed not only how people communicate in their daily lives,

but it has also affected the way that people interact. Communication becomes a more

complex action with the advances in communication technology. Today, most adults and

teenagers can be found having a cell phone within an arm’s reach, many times right in

their pockets. Modern technology allows people to communicate directly from their cell

phone or smart phone device. Emails, text messages, phone calls, and internet browsing

are also available. Applications such as Google have become a widely used resource that

the word Google has been added to the dictionary as an action verb.

With all of the technology available today, it is up to users to decide how they use

it and also how often they use it. Today’s technology overcomes many obstacles of time

and space limitations. Many times, much of this advanced technology eliminates face-to-

face communication.

Social media continues to evolve. Many of the popular social media sites include,

but are not limited to, Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, and LinkedIn. These sites allow

users to interact and share information. On sites such as Facebook, MySpace, and

Twitter, users can post content including comments and photos. On LinkedIn, users can

also upload photos; however, it is different from other sites mentioned because it also

uploads resumes and professional profiles, which can be viewed by potential employers

who are also on the site. Site users also have the opportunity to choose their privacy

settings.

These sites allow people from all over the world to keep in touch with each other

due to the elimination of time and space constraints. The sites provide a quick and

simple way to send messages to one, if not many, people at the same time. With these

advancements in technology, many people are using social media among other

technology oriented forms of communication instead of face-to-face communication, or

even phone calls.

Statement of Problem

How people are interacting with each other on a regular basis and how

relationships are formed is changing and are affected by the increase of technology used

for communication. Some school districts are discussing the removal of cursive

handwriting from the curriculum because so much of communication is done via typing

and is done in print. Technology has overcome many time and space limitations which

has in turn helped many industries and relationships grow and develop.

Technology has become infused into the everyday lifestyle of many people.

Blackberry devices and Droid phones have everything that most people use to

communicate in one device right in the palm of their hand. Smartphones enable the use

of the internet, E-mail, social media, text messaging and telephone calls all in one single

device.

Communication needs to be researched from multiple angles to fully understand

the communication process. The purpose of this project was to understand the effects

that technology and media has on face-to-face communication.

The following areas of research was critical to the study and provided the

researcher guidance with respect to the future direction of communication. Motives to

communicate exist, both interpersonal and media oriented. Research on the technology

must continue in order to properly evaluate the communication process.

Purpose

Communication technology has changed the process of human communication.

Consequently, as the channels of communication increase, the need for face-to-face

communication has decreased.

The author attempted to ascertain the effects of technology on face-to-face

communication using six main areas of study.

1. Motives: why people communicate

2. Channels: how people communicate

3. Technology: how it changes and the effects of the changes on communication

4. Language: each medium has its own language

5. Importance: specifically with face-to-face communication

6. Networking:/the impact on interpersonal communications

Hypothesis and Research Questions

H1 – The majority of respondents will report that technology is used as their primary

channel for communication.

H2 – The majority of respondents will report that technology decreases the effectiveness

of the message.

H3 – The majority of respondents will report that technology decreases the clarity of the

message.

H4 – The majority of respondents will report that they choose a channel of

communication based on the content of the message.

R1 – What channels do the majority of respondents use most often?

R2 – What types of messages do respondents use for each channel?

R3 – Does the decrease in face-to-face communication because of social media affect

relationships between communicators?

R2 – Does the minimization of face-to-face communication affect relationships between

communicators?

Procedure

The researcher gathered secondary data to better understand the subject. The

target audience for the study was Rowan University students between the ages of 18 and

25. The researcher conducted a survey using convenience sampling to reach members of

this universe. The survey consisted of approximately 30 questions that will include

multiple choice, Likert scale, and open ended questions.

The researcher also conducted interviews with selected members of the Rowan

University community to get more detail on the thoughts and ideas questioned in the

survey. The researcher conducted a survey using convenience sampling. The survey will

included 28 questions and one open-ended question.

The researcher also conducted interviews to get further data. All answers were

categorized by the researcher and compared using the demographic information to

determine communication trends.

Assumptions

The researcher assumed that those who answered the survey or

participated in the interviews had basic knowledge and understanding of

what a social networking site is and understood basic changes in

technology over the past 10 years.

The researcher assumed that the participants communicated regularly and

used more than one channel to communicate.

Delimitations

The researcher used convenience sampling for the survey and for the interview

participants, thus, the study cannot be generalized.

The author referenced Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, and LinkedIn, but did not

include information about other social networking sites.

Significance of Study

The researcher identified the reasons for communication using the six topics

described previously to fully understand all of the areas of communication. The study

enabled the researcher to predict future technology and media changes and assess their

impacts on communication.

Definition of Terms

Communication- the act or process of communicating; fact of being communicating, the

imparting or interchange of thoughts, opinions, or information by speech, writing, or

signs (Webster's universal college, 1997, p. 163)

Technology-the technology of a field (Webster’s universal college, 1997, p. 808)

Face-to-face –having the fronts or faces toward or close to each other. Involving close

contact or direct opposition. (Webster’s universal college, 1997, p. 286)

Convenience Sampling- a nonprobability used during preliminary research to gather

general information (Jugenheimer, Bradley, Kelly & Hudson, 2010)

Social-pertaining to, devoted to, or characterized by friendly companionship or relations

(Webster’s universal college, 1997, p. 745)

Media-the means of communication (Webster’s universal college, 1997, p. 501)

Network-a computer or telecommunications system linked to permit exchange of

information (Webster’s universal college, 1997, p. 536)

Device-a thing made for a particular purpose, esp. a mechanical, electric, or electronic

invention or contrivance (Webster’s universal college, 1997, p. 221)

Application Program – a computer program used for a specific kind of task (Webster’s

universal college, 1997, p. 39)

CHAPTER 2

Literature Review

Communication

Webster’s Dictionary defines communication as “the act or process of

communicating; fact of being communicating, the imparting or interchange of thoughts,

opinions, or information by speech, writing, or signs (Webster's universal college, 1997,

p. 163).” There are four communication styles: passive, aggressive, passive-aggressive,

and assertive (Benedict, 2005).

To be a passive communicator means that the communicator does not express

opinions and feelings via a developed pattern. According to Benedict, these

communicators are typically people with low self-esteem. They do not respond to

comments that are hurtful or attack them which can lead to outbursts that leave them

feeling down, ultimately, returning to a passive communication style until the next

outburst (Benedict, 2005)

Benedict adds that aggressive communicators express both opinions and feelings,

often times violating the rights of other communicators. Often times, they are both

verbally and physically abusive. Like passive communicators, they have low self-esteem

but it was previously developed by traumatic experiences in life such as abuse, emotional

wounds, and powerlessness feelings. Aggressive communicators often try to dominate

and blame others, speak in loud tones, don’t listen well, and interrupt regularly (Benedict,

2005).

Passive-Aggressive communicators are passive communicators on the surface but

are aggressive communicators under the skin. These communicators feel powerless and

stuck. They undermine people by showing one emotion or opinion on the surface but

then will have a secret plan of sabotage underneath. Often, examples of these

communicators are Prisoners of War. These people will use facial expressions that do

not match emotions and often mutter comments to themselves (Benedict, 2005).

Assertive communicators state and express their feelings and opinions. Unlike

aggressive communicators, they do so without violating the rights of other people. These

communicators have high self-esteem and value themselves. They are personal

advocates but also respect others equally. These people feel in control of their life and

connected to other people. While aggressive communicators interrupt often, assertive

communicators do not. They speak in a calm tone and do not allow abuse from others,

like passive communicators (Benedict, 2005).

Generational differences impact communication behavior. “Since the days of the

Old Testament and ancient Greece, the word “generation” and its various roots have

connoted the essence of life – birth and death, the maturing of youth and the letting-go of

old age, the rise and fall of dynasties and nations (Strauss and Howe, 1991, p. 59).”

Generations are defined by peer personalities. A peer personality is a

generational persona recognized and determined by (1) common age location; (2)

common beliefs and behavior; and (3) perceived membership in a common generation

(Strauss and Howe, 1991).

A generation gap exists between each different generation. A generation gap is

the change in values between each generation. This can include education, occupation,

and preferences for life choices such as family size. “The generation gap is ubiquitous; it

exists in all American social classes, ethnic groups, income levels, regions and

occupations (Falk and Falk, 2005, p. 24).”

Changes that led to more evident generation gaps include longevity, birth rates,

and employment. People are living longer, which is making a bigger gap between what

is considered middle aged and old. Life expectancies are longer now because of medical

advances in antibiotics, operation procedures, and aftercare. Birth rates are decreasing

with families becoming smaller. In 2002, the birth rate dropped from four million

annually to 3.9 million annually. And lastly, more women are employed than ever before

which “leaves children on their own after school and subject to youth culture (Falk and

Falk, 2005, p. 27).”

According to Gamble and Gamble, communication can occur in two different

forms: interpersonal or intrapersonal. Interpersonal communication occurs when at least

two people interact, exchanging and learning information that helps sustain or terminate

relationships. Intrapersonal communication occurs within oneself. This communication

includes when one has thoughts to make decisions and evaluate ideas within one’s own

head; intrapersonal communication does not include anyone else. (Gamble & Gamble,

2002)

Intercultural Communication is communications with people across the globe

about different information and issues. Each culture has its own set of beliefs, attitudes,

values, and symbols. Because of this and language barriers, there can be unintentional

misunderstandings between different cultures. Intercultural communication is increasing

around the globe with the increase of available technologies (Gamble & Gamble, 2002).

Communication can be referred to as dynamic because all factors of

communication can affect another factor of communication. For example, the tone of

people’s voices or their facial expressions can affect the meaning of their message.

Communication is also considered unrepeatable and irreversible because each

communication encounter will not happen the same exact way twice; there may be

similarities but there will also be differences. (Gamble & Gamble, 2002)

Both written and oral forms of communication exist. Some written forms include,

but are not limited to, letters, e-mails, text messages, and newspapers. Some oral forms

include, but are not limited to, spoken languages, television programs, thoughts, and body

language/facial expressions. Both written and non-written forms of communication have

advantages and disadvantages (Guffey & Loewy, 2011).

The advantages of written communication are a decreased chance of

misunderstandings. Written communication is great for sending another person detailed,

complicated instructions. Because it is written down, it can also be referenced at a later

date. Written communication also has disadvantages. First, it can be considered

impersonal between the communicators. It can take more time than non-written

communication and does not provide the writer with immediate feedback. Written

communication requires a specific vocabulary sometimes related to the topic that may

make it hard for readers to understand (Guffey & Loewy, 2011).

Non-written, often referred to as verbal or spoken communication, also has

advantages and disadvantages. Verbal communication allows the communicator to

receive immediate feedback from their audience. They can then determine if their

message was heard and understood immediately by the response or reaction of whom

they are speaking to. Language barriers can create a hurdle for verbal communication

and interpretations cannot always be exact, affecting the message (Guffey & Loewy,

2011).

Gamble and Gamble (2002) write that non-verbal communication intertwines

with non-written communication and can support or change the meaning of the message

the communicator is trying to send. Non-verbal communication consists of body

language such as facial expressions and posture, along with the environment of the

communication, meaning the space between the communicators and the overall feeling of

the room or area the communication is occurring in. Also, the behaviors of the

communicator can be defined in non-verbal communications. Behaviors would include

eye contact and physical movements during the communication (Gamble & Gamble,

2002).

Formal communication is typically used in professional settings and with people

that the communicator does not know. Informal communication is more relaxed and is

used with family and friends. Formal communication includes mostly written

communications but also includes speeches and presentations (Guffey & Loewy, 2011).

Formal communication includes “messages that follow prescribed channels of

communication.” Informal communication includes “any interaction that does not

generally follow the formal structure but emerges out of natural social interaction among

members (Pearson, Nelson, Scott & Harter, 2003, p. 316).”

Written formal communication consists of letters, resumes, presentation slides,

and so on. Typically, these are one-way communications. One-way communication is

when information is shared in one direction and there is no feedback (Fulginiti & Bagin,

2005). For example, when boarding a flight, the flight attendant will go over emergency

procedures before take-off. This is one-way communication.

Informal communication is more relaxed and casual, used with family and

friends. Like formal communications, informal communications can be written and also

spoken. Written communications include handwritten notes to friends such as cards and

short messages such as text messages or emails. Verbal communications include phone

calls to friends and family members (Guffey & Loewy, 2011).

Upward communication is interactions and communication between people of

different levels such as superiors. Horizontal communication is interactions and

communication between people of the same level such as communicators and their peers

(Pearson, Nelson, Scott & Harter, 2003).

Communication is important in many ways. Gamble & Gamble state,

“Communication is at the core of our humanness. How we communicate with

each other shapes our lives and our world. We all rely on our communication

skills as we confront events that challenge our flexibility, integrity,

expressiveness, and critical thinking skills. By making the effort to become more

effective at interacting with persons from diverse backgrounds and by working at

developing relationships based on mutual respect and a sense of ethical fairness,

we increase our chances of leading more fulfilling personal and professional lives

(Gamble & Gamble, 2002, p. 4).”

Webster’s Dictionary defines trend as “the general course or prevailing tendency

(Webster's universal college, 1997, p. 839).” Thus, communication trends are tendencies

in the way people relay messages and information with each other. The Nielsen

Company, a global information and media company, researched communication trends in

2009, specifically, the Nielsen Convergence Audit which researched phone and television

usage. Noted in the report is an increase in households that have removed household

telephones and now only have cellular phones. In the conclusion, Nielsen predicts that as

more services become available and the prices are reduced, more and more houses will

have these products and services in their home (Nielsen, 2009).

Intercultural communication is communication between people across borders and

all over the world. Different cultures communicate in different ways so to communicate

in intercultural way, it is important to understand the other culture. This will eliminate

the chance of being judged as culturally confused which can lead to missed opportunities

and tension. When a communicator is culturally confused, it means to have a lack of

understanding in cultural differences (Gamble & Gamble, 2002).

Effectiveness of communication can be seen when the message sender and the

audience both understand of the message. Using the correct channel to send the message

is important in increasing the effectiveness. To measure the effectiveness, the sender will

need to evaluate the feedback that is being received and determine if it is appropriate. By

doing this, the sender will know that the message was received and understood properly

(Gamble & Gamble, 2002).

Communication Motives

People communicate daily to interact and exchange information. Why they are

communicating is their communication motives. Webster’s Dictionary defines motive as

something that causes a person to act in a certain way, do a certain thing, etc; incentive.

However, motive used in different contexts can mean slightly different things although,

generally, can be related back to the same Webster’s definition (Webster's universal

college, 1997, p. 523).

Brandi N. Frisby and Matthew M. Martin collaborated to write Interpersonal

Motives and Supportive Communication where they examine more thoroughly why

people are communicating. Frisby and Martin define motives as “the potential for

behavior. The situation or environment can arouse motives. Different types of

motivation satisfy different needs. Purposive behavior can be understood by identifying

the actions that lead to achieving a particular goal (Frisby & Martin, 2010, p. 327).”

Frisby and Martin reference three types of supportive communication: emotional

support, social support, and advice support. They also reference to people having six

interpersonal communication motives: pleasure, affection, inclusion, escape, relaxation,

and control. According to Frisby and Martin, these three types of supportive

communication and six interpersonal communication motives are why people

communicate (Frisby & Martin, 2010).

Frisby and Martin define the three types of supportive communication as follows.

Emotional support communication occurs to assist another with coping when emotional

distress is experienced. Social support communication occurs to help people feel

connected through shared activities; thus providing love, security, and status. Advice

support communication occurs when information is provided to assist in situation

evaluation (Frisby & Martin, 2010).

Frisby and Martin address the six interpersonal communication motives

established by Rubin, Perse, and Barbato in their work. Also Punyanunt-Carter

references these six motives and defines them as follows. Relaxation motives are to relax

and/or rest. Escape motives are used for diversion or avoidance of another activity.

Inclusion motives are used to feel linked to another person or persons through expressing

emotion. Affection motives are used to express feelings such as love or care for another

person or persons. Pleasure motives allow a person to communicate for enjoyment or

excitement. Punyanunt-Carter add that communication motives affect what, why, how,

and who individuals talk to (Punyanunt-Carter, 2009).

Frisby and Martin state, “Individuals who communicate more frequently for these

motives report greater conversation quality, less loneliness, and greater satisfaction with

family members, group members, and supervisors (Frisby & Martin, 2005, p. 321).”

Communication brings about social interaction and relationships which are part of

a person’s everyday life. Interactions can be physical such as running in to someone at

the store or non-physical such as a letter or e-mail message. These interactions and

relationships play an important role in the lives of people and are often reflected upon in

literature (Miell & Dallos, 1996).

Jonathon Turner conducted a study of social interaction where he states “The

basic unit of sociological analysis is not action, but interaction.” He continues, “Theory

must begin with a definition that denotes a timeless and invariant property of the

universe. Such a property is “social interaction,” which is defined as a situation where

the behaviors of one actor are consciously reorganized by, and influence the behaviors of,

another actor, and vice versa (Turner, 1988, p. 13).”

Webster’s defines social interaction as social, pertaining to, devoted to, or

characterized by friendly companionship or relations: friendly or sociable. Interaction,

reciprocal action, effect, or influence (Webster's universal college, 1997, p. 426). Thus,

social interaction is actions, effects, or influences of friendly companionship or relations.

“A good deal of our lives is taken up with our being in a variety of social and

personal relationships; with friends, with intimate partners, with colleagues and with

relatives. Even when we are alone, the chances are that we will spend a considerable

amount of time mulling over relationships we have been involved in recently, or in

anticipating new relationships.” These relationships evolve from communications that

are intentional and unintentional (Miell & Dallos, 1996, p. 23).

Communication Channel Selection

As previously stated, communication is “the act or process of communicating;

fact of being communicating, the imparting or interchange of thoughts, opinions, or

information by speech, writing, or signs (Noll, 2007, p. 2).” When people communicate,

they can communicate either interpersonally or intrapersonally. They can also

communicate using one-way communication methods or two-way communication

methods. One-way communication methods are when the sender relays a message or

information to the receiver, the audience. In two-way communication, the sender does

the same thing. The only difference is that the audience then gives feedback which is

what makes it two-way communication: the communication is going both directions.

The Gruig and Hunt model shows one-way and two-way communication broken

down into four different communication patterns. Under one-way communication are

both press agentry and public information. Under two-way communication are two-way

asymmetric and two-way symmetric. Press agentry, often called propaganda is used in a

one-sided manner to gain attention. Public information, often called publicity, is the

information itself attracts the attention and helps shape attitudes and opinions. Two-way

asymmetric, persuasion, is used to gain understanding from the audience by using the

correct message and channel. Finally, two-way symmetric or negotiation, provides a

happy ending for both parties involved (Fulginiti & Bagin, 2005).

When communicating, it is important to understand the difference between

attitudes, beliefs, and opinions. An attitude is a predisposition to respond favorably or

unfavorably to a person, an object, an idea, or an event. A belief is a conviction, often

thought to be more enduring than an attitude and less enduring than a value. A value is a

deeply rooted belief that governs our attitude about something (Pearson, Nelson, Scott &

Harter, 2003).

The Shannon-Weaver Communication Model, as seen below, has six key

elements in how a message is sent and received. They are: Source/Sender, Message,

Channel, Noise, Receiver, and Feedback (Fulginiti & Bagin, 2005).

The Source, or the sender, originates the message. It is the person or group being

sent a message. The source decides how the message is going to be sent and creates a

communication using an encoder. The encoder specifies how the message is sent

(Fulginiti & Bagin, 2005).

Once the source has shaped the message, it sends the message across the chosen

channel. The channel is the medium. So, for example, a tweet would be sent via Twitter

to the audience using a computer or a smart phone device. The computer or the phone

would be the channel. There can be two types of channels: push channels and pull

Figure 1 Shannon/Weaver Model (Fulginiti & Bagin, 2005)

channels. A push channel is when the source pushes the message to the receiver. For

example, an email or a newsletter that is sent out are push channels. A pull channel is

when the receiver has to pull up the message. For example, an Intranet within a

company, or a newsletter, would be pull channels. Receivers only get the message in this

instance if they retrieve it (Rosenbloom, 2011). Channel Noise, commonly referred to

just as noise, is interference that can change or distort the original message (Chaturvedi &

Chaturvedi, 2011).

The next element in the Shannon-Weaver Communication Model is the decoder.

This element takes the message and arranges it so it in a proper format. In the example

using Twitter, Twitter would be both the encoder and decoder.

If the communication was one-way, it would stop here. If the communication is

two-way, it would have one additional element, feedback. “Feedback is a powerful too.

When it does not exist or is delayed or feeble…then the situation engenders doubt and

concern in the communicator, and frustration and sometimes hostility in the audience.

Feedback tells the communicator how this message is being received (Broom, 2009, p.

272).”

Feedback is sent from the receiver to the sender which allows the sender to know

that the message has been received. They can also determine from the feedback if the

message was understood or if there was any confusion. There can be four different

categories of feedback: clarifying, interpretive, judgmental, or personal reaction.

Feedback can also be either positive or negative (Gamble and Gamble, 2002).

Technology, Social Media, and Web 2.0

“The media and new technologies are a altering the nature of our communication

experiences. The content of the media influences our thoughts and feelings about

the world we live in. Of course, large numbers of us no longer rely merely on the

more traditional media of television, music, radio, film, and print for information

about ourselves, each other, and our world; millions of us now also interact with

each other in cyberspace. Thus, the media and emerging technologies are bring

us new ways of discovering ideas and information, new ways of relating with

friends and strangers, and new ways of learning about our world, our identities,

and our future. The media and technology are also causing us to reexamine our

relationships and redefine our notions of effective and meaningful

communication. Because of their presence in our lives, we may think differently

about ourselves, each other, and society in general (Gamble & Gamble, 2002, p.

17).”

Technology can eliminate time and space issues which can allow people from all

over the world to communicate simultaneously. Rudolf Stober introduced an idea that

“new media are not consequence of technical inventions, but derive from a two-stage

process of inventing and ‘social institutionalizing’ those new technologies (Stober, 2004,

p. 484).” This idea can be related to cause and effect theory. What people are doing now

and how they are communicating now will affect the technology that is introduced for

those purposes in the future. New technology is changed based on how people are using

current technology and “new” technology is introduced. “Even new media were at one

time new. And every new medium will become old at some point in its existence

(Stober, 2004, p. 484).”

Mass communication is the use of mass media to send messages to large

audiences at the same time. Common mediums for mass communication include

television, radio, and the internet. “The important point about mass communication is not

that a given number of individuals (or a specifiable proportion of the population) receives

the products, but rather that the products are available in principle to a plurality of

recipients (Thompson, 1995, p. 24).”

Typically, mass communication is one-way. In The Media & Modernity, author

John Thompson refers to mass communication as diffusion or transmission of media

because of it usually being one-way. Thompson discusses the characteristics of mass

communication based upon how we use the term. The five characteristics of mass media

are: the technical and institutional means of production and diffusion; the

commodification of symbolic forms; the structured break between production and

reception; the extended availability of media products in time and space; and the public

circulation of mediated symbolic forms (Thompson, 1995).

In the 2009 Nielsen Convergence Audit, noted an increase in the number of

households disconnecting their house phones and becoming houses with cell phones only.

In their conclusion, Nielsen notes that with more services available and prices reducing,

the number of households with house phones will decrease while the number of

households with cell phones will increase (Nielsen, 2009).

The printing press, introduced in the 1400s, was used to apply inked images to

paper or cloth. This led to a mass production of books. Prior to the printing press, books

were handwritten copies of the original. The telegraph, signals coded in Morse Code,

were written down by the telegraph operator. Prior to the invention of the telegraph,

people used smoke signals and light reflections to communicate over vast distances with

each other (Rao, 2000).

Later transmissions would include voice and sound over the telephone. This

allowed people to speak with each other over great distances instantaneously and without

having to send telegrams or letters with a courier. The radio, a wireless form of

technology, used radio waves to send voices and sound over the air to a radio receiver.

(Crowley & Heyer, 2003). Years later, the invention of the television allowed for the

transmission of sound and voice and the transmission of black and white images

(Crowley & Heyer, 2003).

The internet is the channel to which social media and web 2.0 applications are

accessed. Web 2.0 are web based applications that allow users to share information and

interact. Social media are networking sites that allow users to communicate with one or

multiple people and share content including pictures, music, and videos. (Frydenberg,

2011) Common social media sites used are Facebook, MySpace, YouTube, Twitter,

LinkedIn, and numerous dating and blog sites.

MySpace was founded in 2003. Facebook was founded shortly after, in 2004 but

did not surpass MySpace in rankings until 2008. Both sites allow users to create profiles

and share photos and videos. Users can connect to friends, families, or strangers and

even bands and celebrities. Originally, Facebook was designed for college students but

eventually expanded so that anyone over the age 13 could join. LinkedIn is a social

networking site designed for professionals. Profiles on these sites consist of resume style

formatting. YouTube was founded in 2005 as a video sharing site where users could

upload and share videos or view other users’ videos (Frydenberg, 2011). Popular dating

sites include eHarmony and Match.com. Both sites require an account set up to use their

services and both have fees related to membership. eHarmony was found in 2000 while

match.com was founded in 1994 (Butler, 2009).

“Social networking sites have clearly created a new model for online self-

expressionism and a new avenue for marketers to reach their customers. It’s a pretty wild

scene at the moment but you can also get away with trying nearly anything (Gillin, 2007,

p. 32)”. Online social media websites are used for members to communicate with other

members of the site.

Technology changes the experiences that people have when communicating. It

also removes the space element allowing people to communicate with the use of

technology in ways not before possible. “Technology continues to speed up

communication as it brings the world into our living rooms and bedrooms, offices and

automobiles. Instead of valuing sequential understanding and careful logic, we now

value immediate gratification and emotional involvement. Technology has also given us

the ability to interact in more ways than, more quickly, and with more people than ever

before. We now experiences events throughout the world as they happen (Gamble &

Gamble, 2005, p. 12).”

Intrapersonal communication is “the process of understanding and sharing

meaning within the self.” Interpersonal communication is the personal process of

coordinating meaning between at least two people in a situation that allows mutual

opportunities for both speaking and listening (Pearson, Nelson, Scott & Harter, 2003, p.

134).”

Interpersonal relationships are relationships between two or more people.

Interpersonal communication occurs when at least two people interact, exchanging and

learning information that helps sustain or terminate relationships. There are many types

of interpersonal relationships including friendship, family, romantic and professional

(Doyle, 2005). Webster’s Dictionary defines each of them as the following:

Friendship is the state of being a friend: a person attached to another by feelings

of affection or personal regard. Family is a basic social unit consisting of parents and

their children, considered as a group, whether dwelling together or not. Romantic’s

literal definition is of, pertaining to, or of the nature of romance. When coupled with the

word relationship, it would be a relationship where romance plays a key role.

Professional is appropriate to a profession. When this is joined with the word

relationship as romantic was joined, it would mean simply, a relationship appropriate to

the profession. No matter what kind of relationship it is, those involved communicate

with each other in a manner appropriate for the bond (Webster's universal college, 1997).

“As our society places more and more emphasis on technology, it is feared that

we will place less and less emphasis on personal relationships. Linguist John L.

Locke, for example, argues tat modern technology is robbing people of the

inclination to speak meaningfully to one another (Gamble & Gamble, 2002, p.

210).”

Gamble and Gamble present three basic needs or functions of relationships. They

are inclusion, control, and affection. Inclusion is the need to be connected to other people

socially. Control is the need to influence and have power over relationships. And,

affection is emotional connections to other people (Gamble & Gamble, 2002).

A network is “an intricate web of contacts and relationships designed to benefit

the participants (Pearson, Nelson, Scott & Harter, 2003, p. 190).” Networks are large

groups of people participating in communication via interpersonal relationships. Group

members can express their ideas and exchange thoughts and emotions with other group

members. Web 2.0 applications and social media make these interactions more possible

than ever before with websites such as Facebook and LinkedIn.

Language & Meaning

Webster’s Dictionary defines language as “a body of words and the systems for

their use common to a people who are of the same community or nation, the same

geographical area, or the same cultural tradition.” Also, “any system of formalized

symbols, signs, sounds, gestures, or the like used or conceived as a means of

communicating thought, emotion, etc. (Webster's universal college, 1997, p. 456)”

Language is used to communicate in different ways, written and spoken. There

are also specialty languages for the handicapped. Written languages use symbols that

represent different words and meanings. In English, and many other languages, we have

the alphabet that consists of twenty-six letters. Other languages use symbols to represent

whole words, such as Chinese and Japanese. Hieroglyphics are an example of the first

written language, using symbols and shapes to represent words. Written language

changes at a slower pace than spoken language (Janson, 2002).

“Written expression differs from oral expression in that it is dependent entirely on

the alphabetic word — and not on the visual and vocal elements that help people

communicate in face-to-face speech. Writing requires a codifiable medium to

convey meaning. Also, it uses a vocabulary, based on known conventions and

rules of usage, to create new ideas. In written expression, discrete elements (the

alphabet) are combined and recombined to help convey new ideas, often using

new words created to meet the needs of conveying those new ideas. Finally,

written language must have a fixed relationship with spoken language, so that

people can communicate the same thought in two different media simultaneously

— as in reading to one another. These elements give writing its characteristics of

permanence and completeness. As opposed to the transience of spoken language,

writing has a lasting, permanent quality about it. Written language is less

redundant, more planned. Meaning and shades of meaning are conveyed by

carefully chosen and placed words. Meaning may be modified by deleting,

editing, and otherwise changing the written words, unlike oral language, where

once words are said out loud, they cannot be unsaid, only explained.

Sequentiality, like the subject-verb-object sequence in English, is important in

writing; spoken language is often understood even when the structure of the

sentence is fractured. In written language, the presence of the receiver is not

required, and the constraints of time and space are removed. Given these factors,

writing can be more analytical than oral communication (Ferris, 2002, p. 2).”

Written language can change based on the medium that is being used. Electronic

communities use shortened words, or abbreviations, and emoticons to interact with other

users. Electronic mediums change the way that an author writes. On the internet, it is

said that people use written speech, writing how they speak (Crystal, 2001). Emoticons

are symbols used to display different emotions on electronic messages. Included on the

next page is a chart of the common emoticons and their meanings. (Crystal, 2001)

Table 1 (Crystal, 2001)

Emoticon

Meaning

:-)

Pleasure, humour, etc.

:-(

Sadness, dissatisfaction, etc.

;-)

Winking (in any of its meanings)

;-( or :~-(

Crying

%-( or %-)

Confused

:-o or 8-o

Shocked, amazed

:-] or :-[

Sarcastic

Spoken language use vocabulary and structure just as written languages do, the

difference is that there are many different dialects when it comes to spoken language. A

dialect is a “variety of a language distinguished from other varieties by features of

phonology, grammar, and vocabulary and by its use by a group of speakers set off from

others geographically or socially (Webster's universal college, 1997, p. 223).” In addition

to different dialects of language, there are different spoken languages. Common

languages include English, Spanish, French, and Chinese.

Gamble and Gamble reference the triangle of meaning which includes there

elements: thought, word, and thing; the triangle explains the relationship between the

three. “The broken line connecting word (a symbol) and thing (a referent, or stimulus)

indicates that the word is not the thing and that there is no direct relationship or

connection between the two. Thus, when you use words, you must constantly remind

yourself that the only relationships between the words you use and the things they

represent are those that exist in people’s thoughts (including, of course, your own)

(Gamble & Gamble, 2002, p. 106).”

Sign language and Braille are two specialty languages for the handicapped. Sign

language is the use of hand motions to communicate words and emotions with people

who cannot hear. Like spoken languages, different areas can have different variations on

sign language. Interpreters will speak what is being signed for those who can hear and

sign what is being spoken for those who cannot hear. Braille is a second specialty

language. Braille uses the dots to represent different letters to allow blind people to read

and write by touch (Davis, 2006, p. 384).

The Importance of Face-to-Face Communication

Communication occurs “when an act of structure: produces a reaction in another

organism, was designed to produce such a reaction, and is able to do so because the

reaction designed to be so (Scott-Phillips, 2010, p. 78).” It is considered an interactive

phenomenon.

Face-to-face communication is important in conversations for many reasons.

These conversations can communicate more through interaction than an e-mail message

Figure 2 Triangle of Meaning

(Gamble & Gamble, 2002)

over the computer. Ron Hess, president of Motiv8, says that personal connections make

personal difference. Nonverbal communication can show others how a person feels

about another person, a situation, a thought, and so on. Body language includes facial

expressions, gestures, and posture. These movements cannot be sent over an email or

seen in a text message.

“Of all the nonverbal channels, the face is the single most important broadcaster

of emotions. You may be able to hide your hands, and you may choose to keep

silent, but you cannot hide your face without making people feel you are

attempting to deceive them. Since we cannot put the face away, we take great

pains to control the expression we reveal to others (Gamble & Gamble, 2002, p.

153).”

Verbal communication is instantaneous between the sender and the receiver. It

provides the audiences the opportunity to provide feedback as soon as they listen to the

message from the sender. Listening is an important piece of the communication process.

Hearing and listening are two different things. Gamble and Gamble define hearing as the

involuntary, physiological process by which we process sound while they define listening

as the deliberate psychological process by which we receive, understand, and retain aural

stimuli. Feedback is connected to listening, as you need to listen to give proper and

useful feedback to the sender.

“We constantly provide others with feedback, whether we intend to or not.

Everything we do or fail to do in a relationship or interaction with others can be

considered feedback. Sometimes we send feedback consciously, intending to

evoke a particular response. For example, if you laugh or chuckle at a speaker’s

joke or story, you may be doing so because you want the speaker to feel that you

enjoyed the story and hope he or she will tell more jokes. In contrast, some of the

feedback we transmit is sent unconsciously and evokes unintended or unexpected

responses… What we intend to convey by feedback, then, maybe not be what

others perceive. Sometimes others intentionally choose not to perceive our

messages. At other times, confusion results because feedback that we mean to be

nonevaluative in tone is interpreted as evaluative (Gamble & Gamble, 2002, p.

189).”

Feedback and nonverbal communication is what makes face-to-face

communication so important. Aside from these nonverbal channels, there are many other

reasons that face-to-face communication is so important. A person’s voice can also play

a role in communicating a message. The speaker’s pitch, volume, and rate can also affect

a message, an effect that cannot be heard through other means of communication

(Pearson, Nelson, Scott & Harter, 2003).

The highness or lowness of a voice is its pitch. Gamble and Gamble mention

vocal stereotypes related to pitch. Strength, sexiness, and maturity are often associated

with low-pitched voices while helplessness, tenseness, and nervousness are often

associated with high-pitched voices. They also discuss volume which is defined as a

degree of loudness. With volume, emotional intensity is reflected; vocal stereotypes are

also related to volume. Loud volumes are considered aggressive and overbearing while

soft volumes are timid and polite. Nonverbal communications also reflect rate, the

speaking speed. The different rate that a person speaks at can affect their credibility.

Pauses and silence allow listeners and speakers to gather thoughts (Gamble & Gamble,

2002).

Rate, volume, and pitch are all important factors in nonverbal communication and

are all factors that cannot be heard through technology oriented communication.

However, there are nonverbal communication that can be processed through a technology

based communication. Abbreviations and emoticons are used in text to send different

messages and emoticons.

CHAPTER 3

Methodology

Communication between two or more people has changed over the years and

continues to change. Face-to-face communication is decreasing while other means of

communication such as text messaging, e-mails, or social media messages are increasing.

These changes in how people are communicating also affect how they interact with each

other in person. The researcher completed secondary and primary research to look

further into these concepts.

Research Design

This study examined the use of technology and its impact on face-to-face

communication. Through research, it is known that communicators have motive and

reason behind their communications and the medium that they choose.

In order for people to be successful communicators, they need to understand how

their audience functions. For example, if they are trying to communicate with an 80-

year-old who is not technology friendly, paper communications or phone calls may yield

higher results than a text message or email.

Through this survey, the researcher studied student members of the Rowan

University population and concerning their motives for communicating, how they

communicate, the changes of technology and how it changes communication, the

language used for each medium, networking communications and why face-to-face

communication is so important.

Source of Data

The researcher used non-random convenience sampling of Rowan University

students between the ages of 18 and 25 using a snowball effect. Convenience sampling is

a nonprobability used during preliminary research to gather general information.

Snowball sampling is when the researcher identifies members of the population with a

specific knowledge and then depends on them to make referrals about the study using a

chain letter format. The sample used was non-random, which means that the researcher

did not provide all members of the population with a fair chance of completing the study

(Jugenheimer, Bradley, Kelly & Hudson, 2010).

The researcher distributed surveys to people within the immediate community via

the internet using email and social networking websites. The author used a snowball

technique to gather data. The snowball allows the researcher to identify members of a

population with particular knowledge and asks them to participate in the study. Those

members of the community then will pass the study on to other members of the

community that also have knowledge of the subject.

Method of Acquiring Data

The data was collected through surveys and in-depth interviews. The surveys

were collected from February 23, 2012 through March 8, 2012. In-depth interviews were

conducted during the same date range.

The researcher composed questions for both the survey and the interview. The

survey was designed and distributed using SurveyMonkey. The survey was designed by

the researcher and pre-tested using graduate students at Rowan University. Pretesting is a

fundamental part of implementing a survey. The questions may look good to the

researcher but by pretesting the survey, the researcher may come across wording or

phrasing that can create bias in the survey. Survey questions included demographic

questions along with questions to determine communication habits. The survey

concluded with a brief open-ended question.

Personal interview questions further looked at the communication habits of the

participants. These interviews will be done in person with participants in a discussion

style rather than a question and answer style. Questions for the interview were separated

by topic and used only as a guide for the conversation.

Method of Analyzing Data

After the data was collected, the researcher categorized the open ended response

question from the survey and the answers from the interview questions. Categories were

determined once all responses were read. The survey was analyzed both qualitatively and

quantitatively for comparison purposes.

The researcher sorted the responses also by demographic information to

determine which groups of people are communicating in different ways and why they are

choosing to communicate in that way. The responses were used to help support the

hypotheses and research questions outlined in Chapter One.

Summary

Through research summarized in the Chapter Two Literature Review,

communication is more extensive than just telling a secret or sending an email.

Communication is the act or process of communicating; fact of being communicating, the

imparting or interchange of thoughts, opinions, or information by speech, writing, or

signs (Webster's universal college, 1997, p. 163).” Every communicator can have a

different style and choose to communicate different messages in different ways.

Through primary research, the researcher determined how technology is affecting

face-to-face communication. Applying the secondary research, the researcher will gain

an understanding of how communication is changing in a select audience.

The results of the primary research study are discussed in Chapter 4. Charts and

graphs will be included to compare and contrast results of the data. The results provide

insight into how Rowan University students between the ages 18 and 25 are

communicating with each other. However, this study cannot be generalized because the

researcher used a convenience sampling for both the surveys and the interviews.

CHAPTER 4

Findings

Methodology Review

The researcher conducted surveys and interviews over a two week period. The

results which are included in this chapter discuss the findings. Prior to conducting the

primary research, the researcher conducted secondary research on the topic to create and

develop a complete understanding of prior knowledge and research in order to develop

effective research methodology.

The researcher had 104 responses to the survey, which was conducted online

using Survey Monkey. The survey was sent out via email, Facebook, and Twitter. The

sample was a non-random convenience sample using a snowball effect to get a larger

number of respondents. This sample cannot be generalized because the way the

researcher conducted the survey, not all of the members of the Rowan University

population had a fair and equal chance to respond.

The researcher also conducted interviews during the same two week period that

the survey was available on the internet. The interview was conducted with 10

participants. These participants did not know the researcher but were chosen to do the

survey based on availability and willingness to do so.

Before the online survey was created and distributed, the survey itself was

pretested using a class of ten graduate students. The students completed the survey and

noted any parts that were confusing or raised concern. Through the pretest, the

researcher found questions where students were not sure which parts they had to answer

and also demographic questions that did not include enough answer choices. Pretesting

methodology is important because it helps to eliminate the chance of bias and ensures

that the researcher is not unintentionally guiding the respondents to choose certain

answers.

Data Results

Survey Results

The survey was available online for two weeks and was sent out via email,

Facebook, and Twitter. The researcher asked people to pass the survey on which used a

snowball effect to gain the most respondents possible. To learn a little about the

respondents for analysis purposes, the researcher included demographic questions. Of

the 104 respondents, 51% were male and 49% were female so the researcher got a good

mix of people male and female that answered the survey.

Fifty percent of respondents were employed while the remaining 50% were un-

employed. Of the respondents that were employed, 40.8% worked 10 hours or less every

week. Eighty two point eight percent are working toward a bachelor’s degree and 24.2%

of respondents were working toward their master’s degree. None were working on their

doctorate.

Ninety two point nine percent of respondents were full time students, 1% were

half time, and 6.1% were part time. Forty seven percent lived on campus and 53% lived

off campus. A majority of respondents, 83.3%, had between one and three siblings.

Sixty two point five percent were single, 34.4% were in a committed monogamous

relationship, and 3.1% of respondents were married. Ninety six point nine percent are

not involved in Greek Life and 3.1% are involved at various levels.

Following the demographic information, respondents were asked to rate various

statements on a scale from one to seven. One was for strongly disagree and seven was

for strongly agree.

The statements that had to be rated are below:

1. I consider myself outgoing.

2. Google’s search engine is an essential tool for communication.

3. I prefer text messaging over verbal communication.

4. Social networking sites are useful for keeping in touch with old friends.

5. Cell phones or smart phone devices are essential to communicate with friends.

6. Cell phones or smart phone devices are essential to communicate with family.

7. People over the age of 25 generally prefer spoken communication over text

messaging.

8. Technology increases my connectivity with friends and family.

9. Social media has improved my relationship with friends.

10. Social media has improved my relationship with family.

11. Social media has improved my relationship with significant others.

12. Verbal communication skills are essential to maintain relationships.

13. Written communication skills are essential to maintain relationships.

14. The use of social media diminishes the clarity of the message.

15. The use of social media diminishes the persuasiveness of the message.

16. More people should use social media tools to communicate because it is easier

than traditional forms of communication.

17. Social media is easier to use than traditional verbal communication.

18. The channel of communication selected affects the quality of relationships.

The average ratings vary for each statement. These statements will be referred to

by number in tables when sharing the data. When these ratings were compared with

demographic information via a t-test, the results differed. However, below are the rating

averages before including any demographic information.

Table 2

Question

Rating Average

5.12

3.43

5.60

5.09

4.84

4.79

5.82

4.43

3.38

3.16

6.52

4.86

4.61

4.60

3.82

4.05

5.32

After respondents rated the statements, they had to choose what their action

would be for four different situational questions. They were provided with four different

choices: A.) Call them, B.) Send them a text message, C.) Email them, or D.) leave a

comment on their wall on Facebook or another social media site.

The situational questions are on the next page.

1. It is Wednesday night but you are ready for Friday night so you ask your

friend what they are up to that weekend. You would…

2. You just found out that there is an important assignment due tomorrow and

your friend has been out of class this week. You would…

3. A close relative of a friend just passed away and you want to see if your friend

is okay or needs anything. You would…

4. It is a slow Monday at work and you are bored so you want to see if there is

anything interesting going on with friends to keep yourself entertained. You

would…

The percent that each choice varied for each situational question. These questions

will be referred to by number and the choices will be referred to by letter in tables when

sharing the data. When these answers were compared with demographic information via

a t-test, the results differed. However, below are the percentages before including any

demographic information.

Table 3

Question

Choice

Percentage

17.2%

64.8%

3.2%

14.8%

37.6%

39.8%

18%

4.6%

75.7%

15.9%

4.7%

3.7%

61.6%

6.8%

25.6%

After reviewing the initial results, the researcher completed a t-test in which she

compared the results using different demographic information. She compared the results

for male and female, employed and not employed, and also the three different

relationship status options: single, in a committed monogamous relationship, and

married. Below are the rating averages when tabulated with each of the pieces of

demographic information mentioned.

Table 4

Question

Rating by Demographic Data

Male

Female

Employed

Not

Employed

Single

In a

committed,

monogamous

relationship

Married

5.08

5.15

5.39

4.85

5.10

5.12

5.33

5.19

5.04

5.06

5.15

5.45

4.55

5.00

3.31

3.54

3.59

3.20

3.57

3.39

1.00

5.54

5.65

5.41

5.78

5.64

5.48

6.00

5.17

5.00

5.16

5.00

5.48

4.48

4.00

4.58

5.11

4.94

4.74

4.98

4.67

4.00

4.71

4.87

4.90

4.65

4.83

4.73

4.67

5.71

5.93

5.84

5.83

5.88

5.79

5.00

4.35

4.50

4.49

4.39

4.59

4.42

1.33

3.08

3.69

3.48

3.30

3.53

3.19

2.33

3.06

3.27

3.25

3.13

3.33

3.06

1.00

6.31

6.73

6.46

6.59

6.69

6.19

6.67

4.56

5.18

5.02

4.65

5.28

4.13

4.67

4.10

5.16

4.56

4.70

4.76

4.31

5.00

4.38

4.84

4.65

4.61

4.83

4.38

2.67

3.71

3.93

3.67

3.98

3.88

3.72

3.67

3.88

4.24

3.96

4.09

4.28

3.50

5.67

5.17

5.49

5.29

5.39

5.34

5.19

6.33

Using the same demographic information, the researcher then compared it with

the situational question data. The results are on the next page.

Table 5

Question

Answer

Choice

Rating by Demographic Data

Male

Female

Employed

Not

Employed

Single

In a

committed

monogamous

relationship

Married

15.9%

18.6%

19%

15%

12.3%

23.9%

33.3%

66.7%

62.7%

68.3%

61.7%

69.9%

60.9%

3.2%

3.4%

1.6%

1.4%

2.2%

66.7%

14.2%

15.3%

11.1%

18.3%

16.4%

13%

37.7%

37.5%

36.6%

38.1%

37.6%

37.8%

33.3%

42.1%

37.5%

42.3%

38.1%

41.2%

40%

15.9%

20.3%

16.9%

19%

16.5%

17.8%

66.7%

4.3%

4.7%

4.2%

4.8%

4.7%

4.4%

78.2%

73.1%

71.2%

81.6%

73.5%

77.9%

100%

14.5%

17.3%

20.3%

10.3%

17.7%

13.9%

3.6%

5.8%

3.4%

6.1%

4.4%

5.6%

3.6%

3.8%

5.1%

4.4%

2.8%

6.6%

5.4%

6.5%

5.4%

2.9%

9.8%

16.7%

59%

64.3%

67.7%

55.3%

67.1%

56.1%

33.3%

9.8%

3.6%

14.3%

4.3%

7.3%

33.3%

24.6%

26.7%

25.8%

25%

25.7%

26.8%

16.7%

Interview Results

The interview portion of the primary research was completed during the same two

week period that the online survey was available. Ten students participated in the

interview. Of the 10 students, six were male and four were female. The interview was

completed in a discussion style rather than just question and answer style. The researcher

had four main topic areas: 1.) technology, 2.) messages, 3.) friend, family, and co-worker

communications and 4.) final thoughts and wrap up.

The four topic areas continued some discussion questions. Each discussion point

was listed with the results for each below the question. A summarized response for each

participant will be listed in a table with each question. The respondents were listed by

number, not name, and their answers will be listed next to the same number for each

question.

Topic One – Technology

The first part of the interview was questions regarding technology to get to know

the participants more and learn about their habits and thoughts on how technology effects

communication or if they even think that.

Question 1 – How heavily do you rely on technology for communication?

While the respondent’s individual answers varied, the theme was that well over

half of communication was done using a form of technology. Most respondents relied

heavily or very heavily on technology to communicate.

Table 6

Respondent Number:

Response (Summarized):

All the time for almost all communications.

Part of daily routine; rely heavily on technology.

Heavily rely on for communication.

Heavily: used daily, sometimes hourly to communicate with both

friends and family.

Relies somewhat on technology to communicate.

Essential for long distance communication.

Almost always rely on technology for communication.

About an eight on a scale from one to ten.

Very heavily, especially in relation to work.

Very heavily: About 80% of communication is done over

technology.

Question 1, Part 2 – What technology do you use?

All the respondents included a phone and either a computer or internet connected device

or medium. Some respondents used more means of communication than others.

However, their answers were similar with not much variation.

Table 7

Respondent Number:

Response (Summarized):

IPhone, Laptop, ITouch

Computer, phone, IPod Classic & IPod Touch

Email, Phone, Instant Messanger

Cell Phone, G-Chat, Facebook Chat, Email, and Video Chat

Internet (social networking sites) and cell phone

Cell phone, instant messenger, email, and internet

Cell phone and computer

Cell phone, email, social media (mainly Facebook)

Computers, smartphones, tablets, anything with internet

connectivity

Computer, cell phone, tablet, Facebook, Email, text messaging,

instant messaging, Skype, Google Talk, ChatON, and Ventrillo

Question 2 – How often do you call a friend vs. text, IM, email, etc.?

A majority of the respondents call limited times per day and often times had

specific justifications as to why they would call. They also claimed that they would text

or use other forms of communication more often than calling.

Table 8

Respondent Number:

Response (Summarized):

Not so much call but all the others are all day with the exception

of when at work.

Regularly but more often text, IM, or email

Never call.

Will call at least once if not several times a day.

About the same but a little more text, IM, email over calling

1-2 times a day.

Only call for homework questions or deep conversations.

Use text over phone calls because of convenience for personal

conversations

Not very often.

Text 10 to 1 compared when compared to calling.

Question 2, Part 2 – How often do you text, IM, email, etc.?

Unlike when they were asked about how often they would call people on the

phone, respondents had much more activity with other forms of communication. This

was part of their daily routines and was done throughout the day.

Table 9

Respondent Number:

Response (Summarized):

Frequently; At least every 5 minutes.

Daily at regular occurrences throughout the day.

Text about 30 times per day; IM about 3 times per week; Email

about 10 times per week.

Hourly; usually will text/IM/email/or video chat a minimum of

once an hour, usually multiple times in any given hour.

At least once a day

5-15 times a day

Text all day, everyday.

Multiple times a day

Very often. It’s the main/preferred communication.

Send and receive messages all day through many different

mediums.

Question 3 – Do you feel that technology is having an effect on how you

communicate?

All of the participants responded unanimously that technology does have an effect

on how they communicate. Please see the next piece, question 2, part 2 for the

participants more specific descriptions of how they feel technology affects their

communication.

Question 3, Part 2 – If so, how? Why?

Table 10

Respondent Number:

Response (Summarized):

Less communication is done face to face.

Technology is essential for communication. Specifically,

eliminates feeling of distance and provides the opportunity to use

written and spoken words along with visual communication

online. This is essential for having family that is out of state.

All my communications are done electronically.

Communicate more often than otherwise would. Also, still using

handwritten letters which are not as common as they used to be.

The elimination of distance. The ability to keep in touch with

people from other states and other countries.

Technology allows people to communicate with each other

without having to actually talk to the person.

Don’t call very often. Text more because it is easier than calling

especially for quick questions.

It has improved communication ability. Can express thoughts,

opinions, etc better in writing/email/text messages better than in

face to face conversations.

It is unavoidable for it to not have an effect. Technology makes

it easier to get in touch with people. However, it also makes us

reliant on it and some prefer it. Widespread adoption is also to

blame because everyone is using it so you have to use it to get in

touch with everyone.

Basic structures of communication are shifting. Information can

be sent and received quicker. People tend to move on from

conversations and block/stop talking to people faster because of

the ability to hide behind technology.

Topic Two – Messages

The second portion of the interview was to discuss messages. The purpose of

this was to see how they would act in different situations just as the survey asked in the

situational question portion.

Question 1 – If you have to tell someone something urgent, how would you contact

them?

All of the participants, with the exception of respondent number six, said that they

would call them. Some of the respondents gave more detail that included everything

from the relationship with the person to the severity of the message.

Table 11

Respondent Number:

Response (Summarized):

Most likely call them.

Call them

Extremely urgent, call. However, it depends on my relationship

with the person. If it’s personal, just a text message or

business/school related just an email.

Phone Call

Call, text, or email. All forms, not just one specific.

Text message

Phone call

Phone call, if no answer then text or voice message. (unless in

walking distance)

Extremely urgent, phone call but if just minor urgency, text

message.

Call if it is personal, otherwise just send a text message because it

is less obtrusive and people respond better.

Question 2 – If you have to tell someone something emotional, how would you

contact them?

All of the participants, with the exception of number six and number two,

responded that they would call them. Number two preferred to do emotional things in

person to deter from any confusion. While this is different from the other answers

because it does not include calling, it is similar in that many of the participants said they

would call for reason of being able to express emotions which you cannot do in writing.

Table 12

Respondent Number:

Response (Summarized):

Call them.

Call them

Everything emotional, I do in person because messages can get

misconstrued via email or text since there is no tone in either and

can be difficult over the phone.

Phone Call – More Personal

Call them or video chat.

Email or text

Phone call

Face to face or phone call. Cannot convey emotion via text or

email.

Depends on kind of emotion. For example, awkward situations

are difficult to deal with so non-immediate methods of

communication like email.

Text if its someone that was recently met, if it is someone that

has been known for a while, then a in person or on a phone call.

Question 3 – If you want to ask someone something about something that is not

soon, how would you contact them?

All of the participants, with the exception of number two and number six,

included text messaging in their answer. Many respondents also included other mediums

such as Facebook and/or email.

Table 13

Respondent Number:

Response (Summarized):

Text them.

Call them

Text or email depending on the relationship with the person.

Depends on person and topic. If a friend, text message unless

planning something then phone call. If close friend or girlfriend,

call. If professional contact, email.

Text them or email them.

Text message

Text, email, or Facebook message

Text, email, or social media depending on relationship with

person. Professional relationships would be email or phone if

other options were not available. Text or Facebook for friends.

Text, Facebook, or Email

Question 4 – How do you feel what you need to get across affects your choice of

communication?

The participants concluded that the message plays a large part in how they decide

to communicate. They also all would have agreed on emotions being an important part of

a message that cannot be expressed in writing as a majority of them all included a

reference to emotions in their responses.

Table 14

Respondent Number:

Response (Summarized):

Anything that is more emotional or detailed would be over a

phone call but anything quick would be done via text messages.

Nature of the message, the targeted audience, technology in terms

of if the recipient will be able to decode the message, urgency of

the information and if it needs to be communicated in a certain

time frame.

Urgent – Call, Emotional – In person, Otherwise electronic forms

are OK. It is easier to get thoughts organized and that way, there

is a copy of what was said for reference.

Very Much. If it is something personal, a phone call is always

preferred.

Emotion, sarcasm, etc. are not easily portrayed in text, voice and

video chat are best for this.

Technology makes it convenient to get your thought across by

providing multiple options to relay a message depending on the

situation.

If something is complicated or emotional, always a phone call.

The message affects choice of communication because one way

may be more sufficient for specific types of messages and to

convey the message correctly.

The message itself plays a large role in the means of

communication chosen.

If the subject matter needs to be more personal that you need to

put in the extra effort but if it is less important than less

confrontational communication is OK.

Topic Three – Friend, Family, and Co-Worker Communication

Question 1 – Please describe your friends’ communication habits.

All of the respondents included text messages in their answers. Some also

included Facebook and/or other social networking sites as part of the descriptions on how

their friends communicate.

Table 15

Respondent Number:

Response (Summarized):

Most communication is done with texts or Facebook.

Mostly email and Facebook or other social networking sites.

About half of friends will use text messaging and IM. A third of

friends will use voice-to-voice conferencing such as Skype.

Mostly text messages.

Texting, IM, and calling frequently. Not as reliant on email.

All forms but mostly text messaging and social media sites.

Text or facebook messages.

Many only text.

Text, facebook, call, or face to face

Text or Facebook/Twitter/Google+

Text or Facebook

Question 2 – Please describe your family’s communication habits.

All of the interview participants had similarities and differences in their

descriptions about how family members participated. When the participants would talk

about specific family members, the parents usually would use phone calls over other

mediums while siblings would used text messages or social networking sites like

Facebook.

Table 16

Respondent Number:

Response (Summarized):

Mostly text messages or phone calls.

Internet based services such as Skype and email.

Parents text but will call 9 or 10 times. Brothers text message.

Brother texts with little reliance on email, calling, or IM. Mother

texts and calls. Father texts and emails regularly with little phone

calls.

Mostly calls or video chat.

Text messages and email

Sister always texts with little phone calls. Mother always calls

with minimum texting.

Older family members via email or phone calls, younger family

members via facebook. Very close family members, text

messaging.

They prefer phone but are starting to use text messages more.

Phone Calls but more recently more Facebook and text messages.

Question 3 – Please describe your co-worker’s communication habits.

When asked to describe co-worker’s communication habits, the answers varied.

However, all of the participants with the exception of number three who is unemployed,

included a written form of communication.

Table 17

Respondent Number:

Response (Summarized):

Mainly text messages.

Most frequently email. However, some use Facebook and text

messaging.

Currently unemployed. N/A.

Similar to self with greater dependence on email and phone over

text and IM.

Some text and social media. Others call depending on age.

Text messages and emails.

Text and Facebook.

Mostly email. Occasionally text or phone call.

IM or email for work related emails.

Email.

Question 4 – Compare and Contrast how you choose to communicate with family vs.

friends vs. coworkers.

The majority of respondents answered that they spoke face-to-face or over the

phone with family members while friends and co-workers they would tend to use email,

social networking sites, or text messaging.

Table 18

Respondent Number:

Response (Summarized):

More emotional or detailed would be via the phone; something

quick would be done via text messaging.

Use the same methods for every group. Does not use Facebook

because respondent does not have an account.

Rarely communicate with immediate family other than in person

but will call or text message when needed. Extended family,

communication is done through text messages.

All forms of communication minus email for family. For

coworkers, email and phone calls.

Call and video chat with family. Only talk in person to co-

workers.

Facebook or text messages with friends. Texting with family.

Emails with coworkers.

Calls are more appropriate with family while usually text with

friends.

Facebook or texts for friends and close family. Distant family

members via phone calls or emails. Coworkers are usually face to

face.

Family is the only group of people that phone communication is

used usually. Everyone else, usually other digital means.

It is easier to communicate vocally with family while friends it is

easier to send a text message.

Topic Four – Final Thoughts & Wrap Up

The last portion of the interview process was to gather final thoughts from the

interview participants consisting of three questions. The questions and the respondents

answers follows.

Question 1 – Do you think that if more people were asked about their

communication habits it would make them think about how they communicate?

Two participants did not think that people would think about how they

communicate if asked about their habits while eight thought that it would make them

think about how they communicate. They also thought it would make people consider

how they communicate think that it would make people change slightly but not

permanently. Most of the participants agreed the way people communicated was

subconscious.

Table 19

Respondent Number:

Response (Summarized):

Yes – people do not realize how much they rely on technology to

communicate

Yes – and ultimately they would probably change how they

communicate after talking about it.

Yes – they would be surprised at how much subconscious

thought goes into their means of communication and what affects

it.

Yes – people generally subconsciously choose their medium by

how they want to come across or how they feel comfortable with

little thought put in the process.

Yes

No – They would consider their habits for a moment but they

wouldn’t change their habits

Yes – but it will not change the way they have adapted to

communicate.

Yes – many people don’t even realize how much communication

changes.

Yes but many people would not change their communication

methods, maybe just slight changes.

Question 2 – Do you think that technology is disconnecting people from each other?

Six of the 10 respondents agreed that technology disconnects people and four did

not. Two of the participants began their responses with “absolutely.” The participants

were then give the chance to expand on their thoughts.

Question 2, Part 2 – If so, how? Why? (If not, how? Why?)

The participants mostly agreed that it gives the opportunity to be more connected

to different mediums. However, people are disconnected by the technology because there

is less face-to-face communication and people will choose different ways to

communicate without needing to actually speak to another person. One respondent even

said that people hide behind technology.

Table 20

Respondent Number:

Response (Summarized):

Ever since the eighties when technology became more available,

people are using it more than face to face communication

Technology prevents a clear message being relayed. It allows

people to communicate but without depth and substance. People

become disconnected to neighbors and even family members.

It connects them more. You know more about a person because

you don’t have to call them or be in person to communicate with

them. IM leads to random chats, Facebook shows what they have

been doing recently, and texting people can get everything in

between.

Many people hide behind the safety of text messaging and IM

without having to be “real”. However, when methods are used as

a tool in combination with others, they strengthen relationships to

maintain contact with people you aren’t in direct contact with.

It is disconnecting people from having the ability to add new

people to talk to.

Technology enables people to stay in touch no matter where they

are. It provides more advantages than disadvantages.

Technology eliminates face to face bonding time and there is less

verbal communication.

It is connecting more people. On social media, you don’t need to

have their phone number, you can just look them up and send

them a message. You can find out what they are up to without

talking to them.

Communication has changed that the norms have become

different. Because social media is available, it allows you to

connect with and get to know people and family you wouldn’t get

to be as close to without it.

People don’t feel as responsible or close to new friends. It is

much easier for people to forget about people nowadays.

Reference to a TV show: change the channel quickly if there is

nothing shocking or amazing.

Final Thoughts and Comments Summary

After speaking with all 10 of the interview participants and reviewing all of the

responses and notes there are some recurring themes between the participants and their

thoughts on the topic. A summary of some of their final thoughts follows.

While technology does provide people the opportunity to connect through various

mediums that were previously not available, it also disconnects people because people do

not speak with each other as often, especially not face to face. This technology that is

evolving year after year has advantages and disadvantages. However, without the

technology, society would not be where it is today. Technology is often times used to

hide behind, especially in uncomfortable situations or topics.

In the future, the interview participants agree that people need to make sure they

are paying more attention to how they are communicating and try to communicate more

via face to face communication, especially in respect to the elder community who may

have trouble trying to learn the new technology.

CHAPTER 5

Conclusions and Recommendations

Hypothesis Statements

The researcher had multiple hypothesis statements prior to researching. The

hypothesis statements dealt with how people were communicating and why they were

choosing to communicate this way. After completing both primary and secondary

research, the researcher is able to accept all four of the hypotheses.

After completing and analyzing the online survey and interviews, the researcher

found that many of the respondents used technology to communicate on daily basis. The

amount of time spent using the technology depended on other things that they had to do,

such as work, throughout the day. Respondents to the survey had to rate statements while

interview participants were asked questions to compliment the statements and were able

to expand on the answers providing the researcher with further insight.

Survey respondents and interview participants had similar thoughts on the

effectiveness and clarity of messages when it came to the use of technology. This also

had an effect on how they were communicating. During the interview process, the

researcher was able to determine that one factor playing a role in how they were

communicating was emotion. Respondents and participants felt that there was no way to

express tone or emotion in writing so there were some instances where it was important

to communicate verbally.

Study Successes and Failures

The study was designed to see how young adults are communicating and what is

making them communicate this way. Through research, the author was able to see how

much the message was the underlying factor in why and how people were

communicating. However, even with all of this research, there was not specific

information from other audiences as the focus of both primary research method tools

were aimed at the specific target audience.

Main Findings

What communicators are trying to relay plays a role in how they communicate the

message. Also, how important or urgent a message is can also influence their choice on

the medium to communicate. Emotions involved with the message also plays a part in

how the person decided to communicate a message. When something is not urgent,

people are likely to communicate via text message, but when it is urgent, they are more

likely to call the person; however, they will still text them for this as well. Whenever

dealing with something emotional, people will communicate via a phone call and some

will even wait to talk face to face. According to the respondents, different mediums

affect the clarity and persuasiveness of the message.

The author was also able to determine that who the researcher is communicating

with helps determine the communication. This was able to be seen when respondents

were asked about communicating with family members versus friends and co-workers.

Relationships are affected by how communication occurs. However, many respondents

felt that technology has both positive and negative effects. Some felt it connects people

more but provides communicators with a place to hide.

Strengths and Weaknesses

The study itself was well designed and the primary research tools were well

implemented. However, the sample size was small. The author had only 104 people

participate in the survey.

The author also did receive some questions about the survey where people were

confused about statements that had to be rated. Overall, the author received good

feedback and was able to still compare the data.

Meanings of Conclusions

The author concludes that technology has an impact on communication.

Sometimes it is a good effect in allowing people to communicate more often but other

times it misconstrues a message making people unsure of what is being communicated.

Technology does not provide means to display different emotions so face to face, or

verbal communication at a bare minimum, are still important to communicate different

types of messages.

Suggestions for Further Research

To improve upon this study, the author would suggest opening up the survey to all

respondents. Design it to have questions that both Rowan and non-Rowan students could

both answer but could be analyzed separately. The author also suggests to try to get a

larger sample size for the survey by leaving it up longer and sending it out to people who

are even outside of the target audience asking for them to pass out the survey to increase

the sample size for the data. By doing this and not eliminating participants who were not

Rowan students, the researcher could have had more data to compare and analyze.

REFERENCES

Benedict, C. (2005.) Assertiveness and the four styles of communication. Retrieved from

http://serenityonlinetherapy.com/assertivness.htm

Broom, G. M. (2009). Cutlip & center's effective public relations. Upper Saddle River,

NJ: Prentice Hall.

Butler, T. (2009). Meeting your match online. Ocala, FL: Atlantic Publishing Group, Inc.

Chaturvedi, P.D., & Chaturvedi M. (2011). Business communication: Concepts, cases,

and applications. (2 ed). India: Dorling Kindersley.

Crowley, D., & Heyer, P. (2003). Communication in history: Technology, culture, and

society. (4 ed). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the internet. New York, NY: Press Syndicate of the

University of Cambridge.

Davis, L.J. (2006). The disability studies reader. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis

Group, LLC.

Doyle, T. (2005, Jan 19). Types of interpersonal relationships. Retrieved from

http://novaonline.nvcc.edu/eli/spd110td/interper/relations/relations.html

Falk, G., & Falk, U. (2005). Youth culture and the generation gap. New York, NY:

Algora Publishing.

Ferris, S. (2002). Writing electronically: The effects of computers on traditional writing.

Journal of electronic publishing, 8(1)

Frisby, B., & Martin, M. (2010). Interpersonal motives and supportive communication.

Communication Research Reports, 27(4), 320-329.

Frydenberg, S. (2011). Web 2.0 concepts and applications. Boston, MA: Course

Technology, Cengage Learning.

Fulginiti, A., & Bagin, D. (2005). Pratical public relations: Theories and techniques that

make a difference. Dubuqe, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.

Gamble, T.K., & Gamble, M. (2002). Communication works. (7 ed). New York, NY:

McGraw-Hill Companies

Gamble, T.K., & Gamble, M. (2005). Communication works. (8 ed). New York, NY:

McGraw-Hill Companies

Gillin, P. (2007). The new influencers: A marketer’s guide to the new social media.

Sanger, CA: Quill Driver Books.

Guffey, M.E., & Loewy, D. (2011). Business communication process & product. (7 ed).

Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.

Janson, T. (2002). Speak: A short history of languages. Oxford: Oxford.

Jugenheimer, D., Bradley, S., Kelley, L., & Hudson, J. (2010). Advertising and public

relations research. Armonnk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.

Miell, D. & Dallos, R. (1996). Social Interaction and personal relationships. London:

Sage Publications.

Neilsen. (2009). Neilsen convergence audit. Retrieved from

http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/09-Nielsen-

Convergence-Audit.pdf

Noll, M.A. (2007). The evolution of media. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield

Publishers, Inc.

Pearson, J., Nelson, P., Scott, T., & Harter, L. (2003). Human communication. New

York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies.

Punyanunt-Carter, N. M. (2009). Understanding communication motives. Texas Speech

Communication Journal, 34(1), 42-43.

Rao, M.M. (2000). Optical communication. India: Universities Press Limited.

Rosenbloom, B. (2011). Marketing channels. (8 ed). Mason, OH: Cengage Learning

Products.

Scott-Phillips, T. (2010). The evolution of communication. Interaction Studies, 11(1), 78-

99.

Strauss, W., & howe, N. (1991). Generations: The history of america’s future, 1584 to

2069. New York, NY: William Morrow and Company, Inc.

Stober, R. (2004). What media evolution is. European journal of communication, 19

Thompson, J. (1995). The media and modernity. Standford, CA: Stanford University

Press.

Turner, J. (1998). A theory of social interaction. Standford, CA: Stanford University

Press.

(1997). Webster’s universal college dictionary. New York, NY: Random House, Inc.