5
and a violation of that prohibition renders both the person inflicting the hazing
and the person submitting to the hazing subject to discipline. Knowingly failing to
report hazing can subject one to discipline. Initiations or activities of
organizations may include no feature that is dangerous, harmful, or degrading to
the student, and a violation of this prohibition renders both the organization and
participating individuals subject to discipline.
2. “Hazing” means any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, occurring on or off of
the campus, by one person alone or acting with others, directed against a student
for purposes of pledging, being initiated into, affiliating with, or holding office in,
or maintaining membership in an organization if the act:
i. is any type of physical brutality, such as whipping, beating, striking,
branding, electric shocking, placing of a harmful substance in or on the
body, or similar activity;
ii. involves any type of physical activity, such as sleep deprivation, exposure
to the elements, confinement in a small space, calisthenics, or other
similar activity that subjects the student to an unreasonable risk of harm
or that adversely affects the mental or physical health or safety of the
student;
iii. any activity, other than that described in Section C.4.h.2.v, involving
consumption of a food, liquid, alcoholic beverage, liquor, drug, or other
substance that subjects the student to an unreasonable risk of harm or
that adversely affects the mental or physical health or safety of the
student;
iv. any activity that induces, causes, or requires the student to perform a
duty or task that involves a violation law; or
v. Involves coercing, as defined by Texas Penal Code Section 1.07, the
student to consume:
a. A drug; or
b. An alcoholic beverage or liquor in an amount that would lead a
reasonable person to believe that the student is intoxicated, as
defined by Texas Penal Code Section 49.01.
In an effort to encourage reporting of hazing, UTRGV may grant immunity from
student or employee disciplinary action to a person who, in good faith, voluntarily
reports specific incidents of hazing prior to being contacted concerning the
incident or being included in the institution’s investigation of the incident. This
immunity does not extend to the person’s own violation of hazing.