group; and 34 per cent in the 57 and above age group) and this was statistically
significant at the 5 per cent level. It can be concluded that younger people were less
likely to have made a wasiyyah. This finding is in line with Brooker (n.d.), SCC
(2006), Rowlingson and McKay (2005), Finch and Mason (2000), McGranahan
(2006), Ahmad and Pyeman (2008). Neither variable marital status nor ethnicity was
statistically significant. The results obtained for variable ethnicity could not be a good
indicator to conclude that Malays were more likely to have made a wasiyyah on the
grounds that the number of respondents from the non-Malays Muslim ethnicity was
somewhat underrepresented due to the constraints mentioned previously.
The findings showed that having higher education made people more likely to have
made a wasiyyah but the result was not statistically significant. Employment was
proved to have an impact on wasiyyah ownership in which working people and those
who used to work were more likely to have made a wasiyyah than others (93.7 per
cent versus 6.4 per cent) and it was statistically significant at the 1 per cent level. As
expected, unemployed people were most unlikely to have made a wasiyyah and the
results showed that none of them had done so. Reassuringly, the finding in relation to
employment variable is consistent to the findings of Brooker (n.d.) and SCC (2006).
The monthly income was found to have a significant role to play in influencing
wasiyyah practice with those who had higher income being more likely to have made
a wasiyyah than those who had lower income. Some 70.2 per cent of the respondents
with a monthly income of RM1,001–RM4,999 were reported to have made a
wasiyyah while only 17 per cent of the respondents with monthly income of RM1,000
and below had done so. This relationship was proved to be statistically significant at
the 5 per cent level. Other financial factors such as owning properties, total value of
assets and whether respondents had received inheritance previously had no significant
relationship with the wasiyyah practice. However, the amount of inheritance received
previously definitely had a significant impact on wasiyyah ownership and it was
statistically significant at the 10 per cent level. The variations implied that those with
a total value of assets below RM300,000, those who had not received inheritance, and
those who had received inheritance around RM50,000 and below were more likely to
have made a wasiyyah (76 per cent, 59.6 per cent and 63.2 per cent respectively). The
Chi-square test showed that health status had a significant impact on wasiyyah
practice at the 10 per cent level. The noticeable trend was that those who had good
health status were most likely to have made a wasiyyah than others (61.7 per cent).
Disability on the other hand was found to not have a significant relationship with
wasiyyah practice and only those who had no disability had made a wasiyyah.